What’s Next, a Murderer’s Heritage Act?

By allowing and encouraging blood sports, society puts itself at risk, for under close examination the line between species is grey and rooted in personal bias.  The serial killer, Zodiak, just one example of a hunter who turned his sights on his own species, called his victims “the most dangerous game.”

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not for a minute suggesting that since there’s scarcely any genetic difference between humans and non-humans, people should view the human animal just as they would any other prey. No, that would be Zodiak’s argument. What I’m saying is that NO animal should be reduced to the level of mere object to be “harvested” at will. It’s a blatant double-standard that killing people is “murder” while slaying an animal is “sport.” Both are murder. Perhaps society doesn’t want to admit how many murderers, or people capable of murder, are out there. 

Human society is by no means at the apex of its evolution—a fully evolved species would have made peace with their fellow animals. Living the lie that a false dichotomy is valid only encourages rationalizations that won’t hold up under scrutiny; it also encourages people like Zodiak to move laterally across the arbitrary species barrier and turn to hunting humans.

In one of his infamous letters to the press, Zodiak wrote, “School children make nice targets,” and threatened to shoot them “as they come bounding out” of the school bus. Certainly not the kind of behavior we should enshrine with an outlandish act of Congress such as the “Sportsman’s Heritage Act” now before the Senate. What’s next, a Murderer’s Heritage Act?

About these ads

4 thoughts on “What’s Next, a Murderer’s Heritage Act?

  1. Since slavery is part of our country’s “heritage” maybe there should be a “Slaveholders Heritage Act.” Of course I better not speak too loud or some Tea Party politician will think this is a good idea and run with it. These regressives will not be satisfied until our country is back in the “good old days” of the 1800′s where they think we belong.

    • Another fitting analogy. And you’re right, they’d probably take is seriously. Of course, they’ve been pushing for and passing animal slaveholders heritage acts for some time now…

      And you’re right about the good ol’ boys pining for the “good old days.” I refer to Nineteenth century behavior and mentality throughout the book. People need to remember that wasteful era and learn from the past.

  2. Pingback: Call Today! The “Sportsmen’s” Act of 2012 Must Fail | Exposing the Big Game

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s