About Exposing the Big Game

Jim Robertson

Experts Watching Bird Flu Carefully in Case It Takes Off

Written by Damian McNamara, MA

3 min read

https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20240514/experts-watching-bird-flu-in-case-it-takes-off

May 14, 2024 – So far, the unexpected jump of bird flu to cattle has not emerged as a new human flu pandemic. Yes, a dairy worker got pink eye this year after being infected, but a larger threat to all of us has not yet materialized.

That doesn’t mean experts are not keeping a close eye on the situation.

WebMD & CDC Live Briefing On Bird Flu

2024 Bird Flu Outbreak — What to Know

  • Join WebMD and federal health experts to learn more about the dangers bird flu may pose. Live on WebMD.com from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. Thursday, May 16. Submit questions to AskLive@webmd.net

“The current risks to the public of this infection is very low,” said Maximo Brito, MD, MPH, a professor of medicine at the University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago. “The CDC is conducting surveillance for unusual flu activity in doctor’s offices and emergency rooms. No significant problems have been detected thus far.”

“Just don’t kiss or hug the animals,” recommended Tina Tan, MD, who agreed the risk to U.S. population from bird flu remains low at this point. Tan is a professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, also in Chicago. Both infectious disease experts spoke during a news briefing sponsored by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).

Infected cows have been reported at 36 farms in nine U.S. states. The federal government is requiring that cows test negative for bird flu, also known as avian flu, before crossing state lines. But the feds do not have jurisdiction within states. Instead, they are making recommendations to help state leaders, agriculture officials, and others contain the outbreak, and paying affected farmers who suffered losses in recent months. 

The H5N1 virus behind bird flu has been circulating in cows since December 2023. The virus passing from wild birds to cattle was a surprise, said Brito, who is also an IDSA fellow.

How Safe Are Milk, Eggs, and Beef?

The FDA tested retail milk and found parts of the virus in some samples. Further tests confirmed that pasteurization, the heating procedure that most milk goes through before sale to the public, deactivates the virus. 

“Thus, the FDA thinks that the U.S milk supply is currently safe,” Brito said at the briefing on May 9. 

At the same time, drinking raw or unpasteurized milk is risker. “It is very important … to alert the public to refrain from drinking unpasteurized or raw milk, that is milk straight from the cow without processing,” he said. “There are other diseases, not only influenza, that could be transmitted by drinking unpasteurized milk.”

https://lockerdome.com/lad/10945201678291814?pubid=ld-dfp-ad-10945201678291814-0&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webmd.com&rid=www.google.com&width=300&path=%2Fcold-and-flu%2Fnews%2F20240514%2Fexperts-watching-bird-flu-in-case-it-takes-off&x=145.1999969482422&y=-117.17500305175781&external_tag_id=%2F4312434%2Fconsumer%2Fwebmd&embed_type=1&embed_frame_container_type=1

Do not touch surfaces that may be contaminated with raw milk, or with the saliva, mucus, or feces of any potentially infected animals, officials warn. 

In areas where there is bird flu or birds that are sick, cook poultry and eggs to an internal temperature of 165 F. Don’t eat raw eggs. Also, cooking beef to the appropriate temperature prevents transmission of infection. 

“To date, the virus has not been found in beef,” Brito said.

OK for Now?

The H5N1 virus could evolve an ability to move to humans more easily, “but that’s all speculative right now,” Brito said. The virus variant that is circulating among cattle is not an efficient cause of disease in humans. But there can be genetic shifts in these viruses, which has happened before. There may be added concern if H5N1 passes to pigs, he said, because their viral receptors are closer to those in humans. 

If the virus does jump to people, children may be at higher risk. “As you know, kids are very different from adults in that they’re much more likely to hug and kiss an animal,” said Tan, who is also president-elect of the IDSA.

There are elementary schools that have chickens and ducks as school pets. Some families have chickens as pets. “Kids also drink a lot of milk, including some kids that drink unpasteurized raw milk,” she said. 

The Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, where Tan works, is ready if H5N1 starts to cause significant infections in children. “We’re going to treat it very much like pandemic influenza. We have protocols in place for pandemic influenza and for COVID, which can be adjusted toward H5N1 if that were to become a real problem.”

Brito added, “We haven’t implemented any specific emergency protocols, but we are always monitoring what’s happening on the ground.”

Coyote trapping, snaring enters grizzly bear management debate

Coyotes
Efforts to trap and curb coyotes is running to complications related to bears. USFWS Mountain-Prairie / Wikimedia Commons▲
Grizzly bear
Grizzly bears have come a factor in efforts to manage coyotes. Wikimedia Commons / Jean-Pierre Lavoie▲

Amanda Eggert Montana Free Press

Updated 16 mins ago

https://www.belgrade-news.com/news/coyote-trapping-snaring-enters-grizzly-bear-management-debate/article_821f0eb0-f1ce-54be-b266-d6c98b5055ee.amp.html

The Montana Stockgrowers Association wants to intervene in a lawsuit that aims to reduce the unintentional trapping and snaring of federally protected grizzly bears.

The Flathead-Lolo-Bitterroot Citizen Task Force and WildEarth Guardians sued the state of Montana and the chair of the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission in federal court last year to limit trapping and snaring of grizzlies during the months grizzlies are likely to be out of their dens. They argued that traps and snares set for animals have injured, and even killed, grizzly bears on more than 20 occasions since 1988. Grizzly bears are currently protected under the Endangered Species Act, though the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agency is weighing a petition to delist Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem and Yellowstone grizzlies.https://e464e55b8fcaaf4d1af488fe93d797f2.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html?n=0

The groups filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to reduce the 2023-2024 wolf trapping and snaring seasons established by the governor-appointed Fish and Wildlife Commission. U.S. District Court Judge Donald Molloy granted the preliminary injunction in November, effectively halving the 2023-2024 wolf-trapping season in occupied grizzly habitat.

MSGA said it filed a motion to intervene this week after the plaintiffs amended their original lawsuit to include restrictions on the trapping and snaring of coyotes.

MSGA, which coordinated its efforts with the Montana Wool Growers Association and the Montana Farm Bureau Federation, argues that restricting coyote trapping and snaring would curb ranchers’ ability to control a particularly lethal predator for cattle and sheep.https://e464e55b8fcaaf4d1af488fe93d797f2.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html?n=0

“MSGA believes this lawsuit will have implications for livestock producers in Montana and potentially states across the West where grizzly bears exist,” MSGA Executive Vice President Raylee Honeycutt said in a press release. “Coyote trapping and snaring are proven methods for controlling one of the most damaging livestock predators. MSGA believes protecting this management tool is crucial for Montana’s ranching industry to continue to protect their livestock.”

In a declaration filed with the court, Honeycutt said that neck snares and foothold traps are the most prevalent tools used to limit depredation by coyotes, that snares are sized specifically to target coyotes, and that MSGA members use coyote depredation traps that are too small to catch or hold grizzly bears. Honeycutt also said that her organization has never received a report of one of its members capturing a grizzly bear in a snare set for a coyote.https://e464e55b8fcaaf4d1af488fe93d797f2.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html?n=0

In a request for summary judgment the plaintiffs filed on April 15, the conservation groups argued that traps and snares are by design “indiscriminate” in that they can kill the animals intended as well as those that are not intended. While coyote traps may be smaller, they are “often as powerful as wolf traps and can cause the same or similar injuries to grizzly bears as wolf traps,” the plaintiffs argued. The plaintiffs wrote that there have been six verified instances of grizzly bears caught in coyote traps since 2010, and such incidental captures likely result in bears losing their toes or feet.

Under current regulations, coyote trapping is allowed year-round in Montana.

Other groups that have requested, successfully, to intervene in the lawsuit include the Montana Trappers Association and the Outdoor Heritage Coalition, a nonprofit 501©(4) that lobbies on behalf of its members’ interests, such as protecting “consumptive use of our natural resources.”https://e464e55b8fcaaf4d1af488fe93d797f2.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html?n=0

An oral argument for the lawsuit is scheduled for June 25 in Missoula.

View on http://www.belgrade-news.com