“Ethical Killers”? A Fresh Face Can’t Mask the Ugliness of Hunting

There’s another tedious article out about the resurgence of hunting thanks to “foodie” hipsters–this time in the Vancouver Sun. (What the fuck’s a “foodie” anyway? It sounds like some kind of baby-talk, or something I might say to my dog at feeding time, as in: “Eat your foodie, Honey.”)

A twenty-first century revival of hunting makes no sense, but the media gobbles it up (especially when they can find a pretty young huntress to pose for their articles). How they think they killing can ever be “ethical” is beyond me.

As a fellow blogger rightly pointed out, “I know gun advocates actively court women. I can’t help but think that with all of these so-called trends, there’s a well-financed ‘social media’ campaign being leveraged against animals and for the benefit of profits. Both the meat industry and the gun industry have found a portal through which they can access these demographics: food. They all think they’re being rebellious hipsters, back to the earth, but I suspect the reality is much closer to them being a stat on a page in a back room planning session about how to tap this generation as apologists for cruelty.”

These “hipsters” are either clueless or in denial of the fact that human population is unsustainably increasing out of control. How can a resurgence of hunting in this century be considered “sustainable”? Do they think they live in a bubble? How long before the growing number of hunters correlates to a major drop in wildlife populations? And how long before the hipsters are backing the killing of wolves so there’s more “game” for them to bring back home to Vancouver?  Not for them to worry about, as long as B.C. continues it’s current rate of wolf-killing—an issue conveniently avoided in this article:

8239082

Ethical killers: Hipster hunters take up guns as part of sustainable food movement

The sustainable food movement is helping to reverse a 30-year decline in the popularity of hunting

By Randy Shore, Vancouver Sun

Kesia Nagata is uncomfortable buying commercially produced meat. “It looks all flabby and grey and not at all appealing,” she says. As a Buddhist-raised, recovering vegetarian, the grisly reality of feed lots, slaughterhouses and the shrink-wrapped denial represented by the neatly packaged meat in her grocery store weighs on her soul.

So Nagata – a 22-year-old filmmaker – is learning to hunt. So is her brother, Kai. Both are in their 20s, raised a stone’s throw from Commercial Drive.

“We were vegetarian growing up, so hunting was never really on the radar when we were kids,” she said. “My parents were trying to make a choice about minimizing evil, both nutritional and ethical.”

Not a lot of the animal protein available met their standard. The environmental impact of what she calls “industrial meat” is enough to put Nagata off her feed.

“I want my meat to be grass-finished, and killed as ethically as possible,” she said. “As much as I firmly believe in the necessity of animal protein and saturated fats, the commercial stuff is all toxic.”

B.C. is experiencing a hunting resurgence, fuelled in part by interest from young urbanites like Nagata and her brother, according to hunting instructor Dylan Eyers of Vancouver-based EatWild BC.

“I’ve done courses for years for friends and colleagues,” said Eyers, who is also a park ranger.

“For the past few years, I’ve been concentrating on urban folks from Vancouver who want to explore hunting.”

Eyers’ Vancouver classes attract a startling variety of people – from young men hoping to reclaim a family hunting tradition to urban farmers, vegetable gardeners, hipsters, artists, musicians and foodies looking for a sustainable and ethical way to feed themselves. “A few people roll up in monster trucks, but others ride over on their bikes,” he laughed. “That seems to be a new thing.”

GROWING TREND

Growth in the number of graduates from the Conservation Outdoor Recreation Education course required for hunters in B.C. and annual hunting licence sales over the past eight years are beginning to reverse a 31-year decline in hunting’s popularity between 1982 and 2003.

Western Canada’s hunting and conservation magazine, Outdoor Edge, is full of readers’ snapshots of hunters displaying their prey. But sprinkled among the bearded bushmen and camo-clad weekend warriors are rifle-wielding women and teen girls.

The number of women graduating each year from CORE has been rising steadily – to 1,725 in 2012 from 791 in 2004 – faster even than the number of men.

“We are seeing a lot more women get into hunting,” said Jesse Zeman, vice chairman of the B.C. Wildlife Federation. “The image of hunting is really changing.”

Nagata completed CORE last summer, and was on a crew filming a hunting workshop near Cache Creek, both run by Eyers. About 40 per cent of the people who attend EatWild BC hunter training are women, he said.

“My CORE class was mostly women and two teenagers, one was a girl just graduating high school,” Nagata said.

For many young hunters, Eyers is a bridge, supplying guidance that was traditionally passed from one generation to the next.

“There’s definitely been a break in that connection,” he said, adding that having an experienced mentor is essential for beginners.

Eyers starts every CORE class with a meet and greet, where students talk about their motives for taking up hunting.

“I’d say 70 per cent of them talk about being more aware of where their food comes from, and they have concerns about the meat they are buying and they want to be responsible for how those animals are treated,” he said. “People are gardening more, they want to eat organic, and I think hunting is an extension of that.”

Folksinger Ben Rogers faced a steep learning curve after taking hunting training last year with Eyers.

Although his great-grandfather, grandfather and father were all hunters, Rogers’ father quit hunting when the family moved to North Vancouver. Ben, now 28, never had the benefit of his father’s experience in the field.

And it showed, at first. “I got skunked during duck season,” he said. “It was a trial. I went in blind and didn’t know what to do – didn’t know how to call ducks, didn’t know where to go to get them. I was learning everything from scratch.”

Goose season was kinder and, with the benefit of instruction from experienced hunters, Rogers filled his freezer.

“There’s a lot to learn if you want to be successful. Hunting takes a lot of knowledge and skill,” he said.

Like a lot of hunters, Rogers likes to share his kills, preparing elaborate meals for his friends.

“That’s the reason I do it,” he said.

“It makes sense to hunt for food from the abundance we have, especially animals that have lived their lives in the wild.”

FLAVOURFUL EPIPHANY

Leung Man completed his hunting class last year at the age of 38 as a logical extension of his passion for vegetable gardening, canning, fishing and foraging.

Born and raised in Vancouver, he had no family hunting tradition, but felt like something was missing.

He has taken up the sport with two friends around his age who share his passion for food. “I have started doing things I used to do as a kid, eating from the garden, fishing and foraging for mushrooms, and my friend who is Italian started making salami,” said Man, who is also learning to butcher whole animals.

“Hunting makes sense as part of a DIY foodie lifestyle. There’s a lot of satisfaction that comes from being able to grow or prepare your own food, and you end up with something that tastes great and I know it’s a lot better for me.”

Man confesses he was “blown away” by the flavour of the elk stew Eyers served at his hunting field skills workshop.

“I think the way that we raise food animals is unhealthy, and it’s a really industrialized process,” he said. “An animal that lives in the forest has a fuller, more natural life and diet.”

On their first hunting trip, the friends bagged and ate their first grouse. It was an epiphany.

“We skinned the grouse and we were about to put it on the grill, and I took a whiff and it had the most incredible aroma. It smelled really herbal and kind of nutty,” he said. “You can’t get anything like that at the store. It wasn’t gamey, it wasn’t tough. It had a really full flavour. It was fantastic.”

Nagata’s first hunting experience opened her eyes to the depth of knowledge and skill required to harvest wild game.

“There was a realization of how many layers there are to it,” she said. “Even walking through the bush with the intention of hunting changes the landscape – you just notice everything. It really changed the outdoors for me. I have always loved the outdoors, but I never liked hiking.”

Stalking game switched on a previously unused part of Nagata’s brain.

“I realized this is how I want to be outside,” she said. “It was like something had been missing.”

PSYCHOLOGICAL HURDLE

Most new hunters worry they won’t have the resolve to skin and gut a large animal in the bush, but before you can even try you have to find your prey.

To find your prey usually requires an intimate knowledge of the terrain, the movements of animals in that environment, their feeding habits and other tendencies.

To hunt deer, you also have to be able to identify the species, its gender and the number of points on its antlers – in the worst case – through binoculars, in the brush, in poor light, at a distance of 200 metres or more.

Only then can you pull the trigger.

Killing an animal is another big psychological hurdle.

“I’m an animal lover, so I know it’s going to be hard no matter what,” Nagata said. “But I really want to get the skills and knowledge to do this properly and not be totally traumatized by it.”

Nagata, her brother and two close friends – all inexperienced hunters – saw four deer on their first trip, but none that were legal to shoot.

“We were nowhere close to being able to kill anything,” she admitted. “I guess I’m still just a poser.”

Nagata aspires to take a deer or an elk, when her skills allow it.

“After eating game, even the best beef tastes like garbage,” she said. “When people ask, I tell them that game tastes like meat and everything else tastes like it is trying to be meat. I could live very happily eating elk and salmon.”

Hunting for wild game is an essential element in Nagata’s vision for living lightly upon the earth, which includes sustainably harvested meat, wild fish and homegrown vegetables. She recently moved to a farm in Langley.

“Given the state of the world, I think it’s really important to learn to do these things properly,” she said. “My whole family is hilariously apocalyptic. A lot of our lifestyle choices and justifications for things hinge on peak oil or disaster. You never know.”

Even if the apocalypse never comes, Nagata is eager to opt out of human civilization as it is currently practised, especially the industrial-scale food business.

OPTICS AND ETHICS

Hunting is an endeavour that comes with baggage, and it suffers at times from its duality.

Dreams of splendid meals built around healthy, sustainably harvested wild protein – the goal of the vast majority of hunters – are a sharp contrast to widely circulated, jarring images of blood-soaked trophy kills, animals brought down simply for sport, a fur rug or antlers.

Vancouver Canucks forward David Booth ignited a vitriolic public debate last year when he published pictures of his kills – a mountain goat and a bear that was lured to the kill site – on social media.

Eyers, by contrast, integrates hunting training with gourmet wild game dinners and sausage-making workshops to keep the conversation about hunting firmly focused on food.

“I never want to be in a position of having to defend a David Booth, because that’s not what I’m about,” he said. “What he does is a completely different thing.”

Based on the sales of species permits issued by the government, the number of hunters who shoot trophy animals is dwarfed by the group that hunt for food – deer, elk, moose and game birds.

The CORE course, although required of all who would hunt, is not focused on hunting, but rather on conservation, outdoor safety, ethics, the idea of fair chase, and, especially, accurate wildlife identification.

There is one inescapable truth – that hunting requires you to kill. After a lifetime of eating meat from animals slaughtered in a factory a thousand kilometres away, pulling the trigger and seeing an animal drop to the ground is a sobering experience.

“You need to think of yourself as a predator, part of the natural environment,” Eyers said.

He explains the ways of animals without the anthropomorphic hue of Disney animal stories.

“Animals don’t die of disease and old age in the wild,” he explained. “When they are weakened or aging, they become prey for predators. Nearly every animal that lives is eaten alive in the end.”

Eyers encourages his students to treat killed game with reverence. He performs his own personal ritual to thank his prey each time he kills.

When Eyers’ students finally harvest their first animal, they feel changed by the experience.

“There’s nothing easy about taking the life of an animal. But once you do, it gives you an appreciation for that life and what it provides for you, which is nourishment,” said Rogers, now a successful goose hunter. Even though Rogers had used guns before, it took time to learn how to shoot moving targets. And that was after many fruitless weeks of not really having anything to shoot at.

When he eventually got the chance, Rogers didn’t over-think, and had no concerns about gutting his prey.

“People tend to overestimate the barriers in hunting,” Eyers said. “Most people think they will have trouble gutting an animal. But once you get in there, you recognized things – there’s a heart, those are lungs – and it comes pretty easily.”

The far bigger hurdle for urban dwellers is sitting still in the brush for three or four hours with no smartphone, waiting for game to walk into view, Eyers said.

Finding game is a skill set that is easily underestimated.

Many animals survive by being hard to find and quick to escape, and beginner hunters usually come away with little or nothing to show for their time.

Hunters who succeed in the field become a part of a human tradition that stretches back millennia, and they find an unfamiliar part of themselves awakened by the process of hunting, Eyers said.

NUMBER OF LICENSED HUNTERS IN B.C. CLIMBING AFTER YEARS OF DECLINE

After 31 years of steady decline, the number of hunters licensed in B.C. is once again increasing.

Sales of basic hunting licences to B.C. residents peaked during the 1981-82 season at 174,000, before sliding to less than 82,000 in 2003. Stung by recession, the provincial government doubled licence fees in 1982 as a cash grab, according to Jesse Zeman, vice chairman of the B.C. Wildlife Federation. The Conservation Outdoor Recreation Education (CORE) course required for hunters in B.C. was privatized and removed from high school curricula.

“We went from 12,000 CORE graduates in one year to 1,800 the next,” said Zeman. “We lost 84 per cent of our recruitment in one year.” After the number of active hunters bottomed out in 2003, the provincial government launched a hunter recruitment and retention plan with a target of attracting and maintaining 100,000 active resident hunters. Licence fees and permit fees to hunt individual species were slashed. This year, a new class of inexpensive licences will be introduced to encourage teens to take up the sport, mentored by experienced hunters.

The effort is paying off. More than 97,000 basic resident hunting licences were sold last year.

Hunting and angling licences bring in about $12 million a year to government coffers.

About $2.5 million of that is targeted to conservation programs through the Habitat Conservation Trust. Hunting-friendly organizations such as the BCWF and Ducks Unlimited actively promote wildlife conservation, participate in wildlife counts and research, lobby to protect sensitive habitat, and take on restoration and wildlife recovery projects at little or no expense to taxpayers.

BCWF members donate about 300,000 volunteer hours a year to environmental stewardship in B.C., Zeman said. The province’s recruitment program recognizes the hunting community as an essential element of its wildlife management strategy.

Local hunters and hunting tourism generate about $50 million in economic activity each year, mostly in rural communities, according to government figures.

rshore@vancouversun.com

Listen to a podcast on the revival of hunting at vancouversunpodcasts.com

 

17 thoughts on ““Ethical Killers”? A Fresh Face Can’t Mask the Ugliness of Hunting

  1. This is a perverted recreation of the natural movement from the 1960s and 1970s. Meanwhile while they supposedly eat the so called “natural meat” of an animal they hunted and killed, they probably also eat GMO grown vegetables with it! I don’t need to state any facts to repudiate this bogus story about so called ethical hunting. You pretty much hit it on the head Jim. However, I think its time for the anti-hunting community to start slamming these stories and become more aggressive towards the media when they try to brainwash or put out B.S stories like the one they just did to get younger people to embrace the hunter lifestyle. This is 2013 for God’s sake! Let the way of the the hunters die off already!

  2. Thanks for a really irresponsible article about hunting wild animals.

    This is by my friend……on his blog “another tedious article out about the resurgence of hunting thanks to “foodie” hipsters–this time in the Vancouver Sun. (What the fuck’s a “foodie” anyway? It sounds like some kind of baby-talk, or something I might say to my dog at feeding time, as in: “Eat your foodie, Honey.”)
    A twenty-first century revival of hunting makes no sense, but the media gobbles it up (especially when they can find a pretty young huntress to pose for their articles). How they think they killing can ever be “ethical” is beyond me.

    As a fellow blogger rightly pointed out, “I know gun advocates actively court women. I can’t help but think that with all of these so-called trends, there’s a well-financed ‘social media’ campaign being leveraged against animals and for the benefit of profits. Both the meat industry and the gun industry have found a portal through which they can access these demographics: food. They all think they’re being rebellious hipsters, back to the earth, but I suspect the reality is much closer to them being a stat on a page in a back room planning session about how to tap this generation as apologists for cruelty.”

    These “hipsters” are either clueless or in denial of the fact that human population is unsustainably increasing out of control. How can a resurgence of hunting in this century be considered “sustainable”? Do they think they live in a bubble? How long before the growing number of hunters correlates to a major drop in wildlife populations? And how long before the hipsters are backing the killing of wolves so there’s more “game” for them to bring back home to Vancouver? Not for them to worry about, as long as B.C. continues it’s current rate of wolf-killing—an issue conveniently avoided in this article:”

    This from me

    From the image of the woman with the white dog smiling to the misleading tenor of your article about getting back to the wild and foodies celebrating hunting as a way to connect with nature, your article was extremely disturbing to me. Wild animals number in the thousands of some populations, in the hundreds in others. There is nothing hip, grand, ethical or impressive about setting out to kill wild animals. There is nothing impressive or admirable about getting into touch with your inner killing self or overcoming the shock of taking an innocent life. Your article is not hip, cool or about anything other then promoting a new culture of killing….I’m disgusted. Take some time to research the loss of habitat, the over hunting of wildlife and the crippling effects that randomly killing wildlife has on the social structure of many wild animal families. Perhaps you may have survived if your parents had been shot and killed when you were a child. Some social organization might have brought you to an orphanage or a relative taken you in. For wildlife, the pups, cubs or young of species are left to fend for themselves while the hunter with the scope, high powered rifle, bow and arrow walks away with its dead parent. We live in a world now where we are approaching 7 billion people, how much can our wildlife withstand, waves of new hunters with high tech gear….I think not. Its time to let this “culture” of killing wildlife die out instead of promoting hunting as a valiant and impressive feat.…Your article is spectacularly misleading; another attempt to sanitize and glorify killing wildlife.

    Louise Kane, JD

  3. Thanks for the heads up on this piece, Jim. While looking for a place to comment on the article and refute some of the mistaken notions, I came upon two other places where people can leave comments if they have FB accounts. One is on the Vancouver Sun’s own page, where the article is printed, and the other is in The Green Man blog, which has the associated podcast. I commented below the podcast. I was surprised and happy to see a healthy number of critical voices on the Vancouver Sun page. I expected the usual pro-hunting droves to descend on the piece, but there’s a decent citizen rebuttal on that page. Thank you, Vancouver, for challenging the meme.

  4. So the foodies are starting a new trend, how chic. Personally I’d rather live on gourmet coffee and donuts then be part of that group . I bet this is not going to go over big whit the good ole boys and taking over their turf. They don’t like the wolves taking their food they most certainly are not going to like the foodies. I think there’s going to be a few “accidents” in the woods and it’s not going to be pretty .

  5. For people to say this is a way to be one with nature, I say the next time I buy a plane ticket I’m a natural bird. There is nothing manly, ethical, or human about wanting to actively end lives of others, it’s actually scary and barbaric. Trend armies kill everything in it’s path and makes me hate mainstreamers. “Chic” is not what comes to mind when I think about humans harming others, I think psychopathic serial killer in training. Jim you have provided a wonderful insight into the mind othis “ethical” mask killers will put over the reality of what they really do.

  6. all this and more is what unfortunately makes me wish the human race would become extinct quickly….sorry,
    but I really don’t see any indication that humans will ever have a longterm/forever peaceful lifestyle…..and its really hysterical when I hear that humans are the”superior” species-give me a break

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s