When Ryan supports hunting, he turns his back on American values

When Ryan supports hunting, he turns his back on American values

 by Ingrid Newkirk

Gun violence is a divisive issue in America, but one gun-related trend has become clear over the last 30 years: Fewer Americans hunt.

Corporations that make guns and hunting accessories are busy trying to fight this trend and get members of Congress to promote hunting by arming them with specious arguments about the right to bear arms. But Americans outside the Beltway get the absurdity—the 2nd Amendment was drafted to defend citizens against a government gone haywire, not against ducks and deer.

Consider what new Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) says of a pathetic little group in Congress called the “Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus”: “It’s about protecting our rights, our habitat, and our access.” For him to imply that hunters are victims is absurd, and he is far too clever to believe it himself.Perhaps we might learn something about members’ motivation from revelations like this: In April 2013, Ryan cosponsored HR 322, a pro-hunting bill that the Safari Club International (SCI) wanted passed. Just 5 legislative days after doing what SCI wanted, Ryan accepted a $1,000 check from SCI. The House Ethics Committee is being asked to investigate this seeming transaction and others like it in which gun and hunting industry corporations give cash to members’ re-election campaigns in order to get what they want.

SCI couldn’t be further from American public opinion. SCI promotes the killing of the “Big Five” species (elephants, rhinos, leopards, Cape buffalo, and lions), which requires no skill, just deep pockets and the ability to squeeze a trigger. Walter Palmer, the dentist who murdered the beloved lion Cecil, was a member, as was German entrepreneur Rainer Schorr, who shot the biggest elephant seen in Zimbabwe in decades. It’s less of a sport than a pathology: “Big Five” hunting, like sex tourism, enables men to fulfill dark empowerment fantasies that hurt victims on foreign soil.

But the above-mentioned “Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus” is not much better. Do most Americans even want this caucus to exist? Do we want our national leaders supporting a hobby that teaches children to kill others? It is this lack of empathy that PETA works to counter: Whenever hunters accidentally get shot, PETA contacts them and asks them to realize that the animals they hunt experience the same thing or worse and encourages them to rediscover the empathy that got buried within them when someone taught them to hunt.

The panicky last gasps of the hunting industry can also be seen in the “right to hunt” amendments that it has been sending to state legislatures in hopes of protecting hunting despite public opinion against it.

Does Ryan’s support for hunting represent his home state of Wisconsin? Not really, 2014 Wisconsin hunting license sales were the lowest since 1976. It’s not even accurate to say that he’s representing most members of Congress. Many members in both chambers and both parties work hard on behalf of their constituents to protect animals by getting the federal government to hold animal abusers accountable and ensure that the Animal Welfare Act is enforced.

A practicing Catholic, Ryan’s bloodlust is also contrary to many Americans’ religious beliefs, including his own. His church clearly dictates that we should respect creation, not destroy it, and Pope Francis has condemned violence on numerous occasions. Yet Ryan frequently cites his faith during political discourse.

Ryan’s zeal for hunting isn’t even representative of conservative values. Hunting celebrates death, exposes children to gun violence and wastes millions of taxpayer dollars every year through the bloated U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and its state agencies. And the U.S. taxpayer foots the bill.

Americans hate oppressors, and hunting epitomizes oppression: the powerful ganging up on the weak. A wise elected official would recognize that it’s not just human beings who have a right to fair treatment and protection from cruelty.

Americans across the political spectrum have a right of their own: the right to be disappointed that Speaker Ryan would ignore public sentiment, take SCI’s money and do SCI’s bidding. I join the millions of Americans who hope he will stop doing the hunting industry’s bidding and shift his support away from the cruel blood sport.

Newkirk is the president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 501 Front St., Norfolk, VA 23510; www.PETA.org.

4 thoughts on “When Ryan supports hunting, he turns his back on American values

  1. Ryan sounds like a compulsive killer, like Dr. Palmer, and I doubt if this good Catholic boy will reform.

    I’m a long-time PETA member and admirer of Ingrid Newkirk, but I beg to differ on this. Hunting may be falling out of favor in urban areas among progressives, but it is alive and well in the South and West.

    Cecil was different. His murder evoked worldwide outrage. But he was a particularly beautiful animal, a member of a charismatic species. He was killed in an egregious way by a morally unattractive human specimen. But millions of the hunted are unknown. Yes, there are wolf advocates. But that animal has a much longer history of being hated and tortured. The deaths of thousands of deer and elk every year don’t get much attention. Then there are those unfortunates classified as “varmints” and “trash animals.” They are the “nuisances” most of whom who aren’t big enough or, God help them, cute enough to get much sympathy.

    Newkirk notes that religion does not support hunting. That would be news to the Christian hunting clubs, particularly in the South. Baptist churches in Kentucky gave rifles to attract new members the way banks hand out toasters As for the Catholic Church, the Pope may condemn violence, but he is talking about human-on-human violence. Look at two of the major Church theologians, St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. Augustine argued that Christ allowed the 2000 Gadarene swine to drown (after he had cast demons out of them) to prove that human beings have no duty toward animals. Aquinas argued that only humans have moral status and that we owe them no consideration. Anyone with doubts should ask members of the clergy directly if they consider hunting (and trapping) and their associated suffering and death sinful. Ask if they are moral sins. Don’t settle for weasel words. I would be astonished at any affirmative answers.

    For a bigger discussion of the bond between guns and hunting and religion, read Joe Bageant’s book DEER HUNTING WITH JESUS.

    Also for the gun give-a-ways: http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/kentucky-church-gives-out-guns-find-jesus; http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/03/16/baptist-churches-raffle-off-guns-to-attract-new-members; and http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/03/03/3352681/kentucky-churches-giving-1000-guns-help-people-discover-jesus/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s