Trump revokes Alaska refuge rule, allows wolves to be killed

Predators can kill more than 80 percent of the moose and caribou that die during an average year, according to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.


Associated Press

Published on April 4, 2017

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — The state of Alaska’s toolkit for increasing moose and caribou numbers includes killing wolf pups in dens, shooting wolf packs from helicopters and adopting liberal hunting regulations that allow sportsmen to shoot grizzlies over bait.

But when state officials wanted to extend “predator control” to federal wildlife refuges, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said no. And after years of saying no, the agency late last year adopted a rule to make the denial permanent.

Alaska’s elected officials called that an outrage and an infringement on state rights. The dispute reached the White House.

President Donald Trump on Monday signed a resolution approved by the U.S. House and Senate to revoke a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule banning most predator control on Alaska refuges. Alaska’s lone U.S. representative, Republican Don Young, says Alaska was promised it could manage game animals. Refuge overseers have ignored the law, he said.

“Some of you will say, ‘Oh, we have to protect the wolf puppies,’” Young told colleagues on the floor of the House. “That’s not what it’s about. It’s about the law.”

Congress explicitly gave Alaska authority to manage wildlife in the Alaska Statehood Act and two more laws, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, said after voting to revoke the rule.

Alaska’s 16 national wildlife refuges cover about 120,000 square miles, an area slightly smaller than the state of New Mexico. Residents of rural villages living a subsistence lifestyle rely on refuges as hunting grounds. So do urban sportsmen.

Critics contend Alaska officials use unsportsmanlike techniques that would have horrified Teddy Roosevelt, creator of the first federal refuge, to boost moose and caribou numbers. Sportsmanship, however, is not a consideration, according to state authorities, when it comes to surgically removing certain numbers of predators to benefit prey populations.

Predators can kill more than 80 percent of the moose and caribou that die during an average year, according to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.

Alaska’s mandate for killing predators comes from a law passed by the state Legislature recognizing that certain moose, caribou, and deer populations are especially important human food sources. When those populations drop too low, the Alaska Board of Game, which regulates hunting and trapping, can authorize “intensive management.”

The focus once was almost totally wolves. Since 1993, the state has killed hundreds along with lesser numbers of black and grizzly bears that prey on caribou or moose calves.

Federal wildlife refuges operate under a different mandate. For example, the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, where the state in 2010 sought to kill wolves from helicopters to protect caribou on Unimak Island, was created by Congress with the mission of conserving animal populations and habitats “in their natural biodiversity.”

Geoff Haskett, former Alaska regional director for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said the agency adopted the rule for Alaska refuges after repeatedly fending off state attempts to extend predator control in direct conflict with refuge purposes. Some attempts up in court. For two years, he said, the state authorized an overharvest by hunters of grizzly bears on the Kenai Peninsula. The agency closed the Kenai Peninsula National Wildlife Refuge in response.

“Brown bear biologists from both the state side and the federal side had real concerns about the amount of unlimited harvest and the amount of females that would be taken by what was proposed by the state,” Haskett said.

Haskett left the agency and is now acting director of the National Wildlife Refuge Association. Even though President Trump signed the congressional resolution, Haskett believes it will not give the state of Alaska carte blanche to begin predator control on federal refuges.

“It doesn’t change the laws and authorities and existing regulations that the service already has,” Haskett said. “It’s really back to square one.”

Ken Marsh, spokesman for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, agreed. Without a blanket rule, federal refuge managers likely will consider predator control requests on a case-by-case basis, he said, under provisions of federal environmental law.

6 thoughts on “Trump revokes Alaska refuge rule, allows wolves to be killed

  1. There aren’t enough bad words! Why do hunters think they should have the right to kill and trap in national park and refuges? When they finally kill all the wolves, I hope no one talks about bringing them back again. I know they’re important and beautiful–I’ve sponsored dozens in sanctuaries–but if their future is a constant round of trapping and killing, it’s just not fair. It would be nice to have one huge wilderness area with no hunting, no trapping, no killing! Just the wildlife left alone.

  2. This horribly corrupt, anti-environmental, anti-wildlife WH is now showing its true colors:the WAR AGAINST THE WILD WILL BE UNCEASING, to provide more targets for the Hunting Lobby, of which Trump’s spoiled, rotten killer sons (and their buddies now in several government agencies). belong. To top it off, Maniacal Trump is playing Nuclear Roulette with the planet, causing more countries to become nervous about what this country is up to.
    Trump has Alt. Right cronies Steve Bannon, White Supremacist Richard Spencer, and Mutli-Billionaire Conservatives, Robert Mercer & his wife behind him all the way–with plenty of money laundering & $$$ connections to boot.
    New Flash: this bunch in the WH are not your usual run-of the-mill politicians. They are now a Dynasty with Trump on the thrown.
    This is a very sad time for Nature and her wild animals–and it is just the beginning.

  3. Hunters have become yet another powerful corporation, with its lobbyists, political supporters and political bootlickers. It is as if there not already enough factors destroying the planet, now the world has to deal with the selfish pleasures of a few abnormal persons.

    • Yes, hunters have become a powerful interest group. As we see in articles like this, hunters often succeed in defining the terms of the debate. Teddy Roosevelt was a big game hunter, not a conservationist.
      I have argued with so-called “bear biologists” in several states. When pressed, they reveal themselves as game managers with extensive knowledge of hunting, but little knowledge of biology. They view bears as an agricultural product to be “harvested.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s