Researcher files complaint against WSU

WSU’s leading wolf expert Robert Wielgus filed a complaint today detailing harassment and threats from WSU administrators following his public statements about wolf killings in the fall.

Wielgus is a WSU professor and director of the Large Carnivore Conservation Laboratory. Wielgus’ research has been considered in the drafting and implementation of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (WDFW) Gray Wolf Conservation and Management Plan and he is an adviser to the state’s Wolf Advisory Group, according to the complaint.

The 12-page complaint, sent to the WSU Faculty Status Committee by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) on Friday, urges the Faculty Senate committee to investigate the actions of WSU administrators against the professor’s academic freedom and recommend disciplinary actions for the administrators.

Adam Carlesco, PEER staff counsel and the author of the complaint, said he has not yet received a response from the committee. Robert Rosenman, co-chair of the Faculty Status Committee, said all investigations by the committee are confidential, according to their bylaws.

Faculty Senate Chair A.G. Rud said he plans to talk to the Senate executive committee about this next week.

“I am not holding out a tremendous amount of hope that the Senate will do its job [in evaluating the complaint],” Carlesco said.

Carlesco said that according to the WSU Faculty Manual, there must initially be internal discussions in this process, which Wielgus already had with College of Agriculture, Human and Natural Resource Sciences (CAHNRS) Dean Ron Mittelhammer.

“[Wielgus’s] protestations fell on deaf ears,” Carlesco said.

WSU News Director Rob Strenge declined to comment and said this is a CAHNRS faculty issue.

Marta Coursey, CAHNRS communication director, said this is a personnel matter and, according to policy, the college doesn’t publicly discuss personnel issues in order to protect WSU faculty and staff confidentiality and privacy.

“CAHNRS administration is currently reviewing Dr. Wielgus’ communications and performance with respect to his roles and responsibilities as a WSU faculty member,” Coursey said.

Carlesco said WSU officials and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) researchers had a verbal agreement to shut down Wielgus’s lab and give the research funding to the University of Washington.

“Litigation is not out of the picture on this matter,” Carlesco said.

The official complaint alleges 10 violations committed by WSU President Kirk Schulz, Mittelhammer and CAHNRS Associate Dean Jim Moyer, mainly following two public statements Wielgus made in the past year about wolf pack killings in Northeast Washington.

The first statement was about the killing of a gray wolf pack by the WDFW at Profanity Peak in August. Wielgus criticized a rancher in the area, whom the professor said released his cattle on top of the Profanity Peak wolf pack’s den. Wilegus argued that the wolf pack’s death could have been avoided, and that the rancher refused to cooperate with his lab or the WDFW in avoiding such confrontations, according to the complaint.

Wielgus said his comments about this created a “firestorm,” according to a Daily Evergreen article. WSU disavowed his comments, stating the rancher did not release his cattle onto the wolf den, but four miles from it, and that the rancher cooperated with WDFW. The university publicly accused Wielgus of “inaccurate and inappropriate” statements in a news release.

Wielgus made the second statement when recommending wolf preservation pratices to the Wolf Advisory Group in March. The university alleged that this qualified as illegal lobbying activity because he sent it from his WSU email address.

One of the 10 violations listed in the complaint states that CAHNRS administrators and Schulz approved funding restrictions denying Wielgus summer funding or grant research money for his lab.

According to the complaint, there is no reasonable way under the Faculty Manual’s academic freedom policy to reconcile the administrators’ actions, which the complaint alleges were motivated by political pressure.

In 2013, Moyer made it clear that Wielgus was considered a political target of state Rep. Joel Kretz (R), the livestock industry, and possibly the WSU College of Agriculture, according to the complaint.

On Aug. 23, 2014, a female member of the Huckleberry wolf pack in Northeast Washington was shot and killed by a WDFW-hired marksman, as the pack had been preying on a flock of 1,800 sheep, according to the WDFW website.

According to the complaint, Gov. Jay Inslee then asked Wielgus for clarification on the inconsistencies in the reports published by the WDFW on the matter and others who were involved. In briefing Inslee’s office on his findings, Wielgus showed the misrepresentations the WDFW made in its reports, causing several of the department’s officials to resign.

After Wielgus presented his research to the legislature in 2015, Kretz told former WSU President Elson S. Floyd that he wanted to shut down Wielgus’ lab and stop its research, according to the complaint. Kretz introduced a provision to a bill that led to less funding for the lab, according to the complaint.

Brendon Wold, Kretz’s public information officer, declined to comment.

Carlesco said there is “ample precedent” for WSU suppressing a professor’s first amendment rights, bringing up a case filed in 2013, according to the case publication.

Wielgus stated in the complaint that he would like the matter settled amicably without resorting to litigation. For now, Wielgus said he is not commenting on the matter himself.

Also:

http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/331068-trump-starts-rollback-of-obamas-offshore-drilling-restrictions

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Researcher files complaint against WSU

    • Well he’s got some nice looking horses….ages ago I used to really like ranchers and appreciated that the vast acres they owned kept the land from being developed and helped wildlife…..then I got educated. There are a few conservation minded ranchers who will live with predators, however this guy is definitely not one of them. He’s obviously in the pocket of big ag and the livestock industry and anti predator thru and thru.
      Not only is Wielgus correct in filing a complaint, he should file a lawsuit on behalf
      of the Profanity Peak pack…..if only that were possible.

      • I agree, here is a chance for a legal fight. Here is a situation that environmental organizations should do what they claim, back up Wielgus.

  1. The director of Washington Dept of Fish & Wildlife worked for Idaho Department of Fish and Game for 30 years. Don’t expect anything compassionate, progressive, or just from him or his minions….ever. And what a surprise that ag interests and their lapboys in the legislature want to stifle all embarrassing academia.

  2. When it comes to WSU and its history of animal issues, I am always skeptical of their side of the story, for the reasons below:

    An animal rights group, Stop Animal Exploitation Now wants an investigation into the growing number of bear deaths at the Bear Research, Education, and Conservation Center. At least 15 grizzly bears died in the last 6 years, and 3 bighorn sheep died after being overdosed. Some of the bears were healthy but euthanized for research purposes, and at least one was mauled by other bears. There are questions of how the animals were treated and cared for in the others.

    In the late 1980s-1990s, Professor Fred Gilbert was researching traps to kill wild animals, a study requested by the fur industry. Seattle television station KIRO tried to get information on the research accusations that over 2 dozen beavers were drowned in his experiments. The TV station was denied access to information by Whitman County Superior Court Judge Wallis Friel, who declared released video tapes and other data would interfere with academic freedom. The beavers might have objected if they hadn’t died during the testing procedures.

    At about the same time I was working with a group attempting to stop WSU from coming to Spokane to pick up dogs and cats at a local shelter to take back to campus for whatever fate awaited them. Dr. Ghery D. Pettit, a surgeon in the College of Veterinary Medicine, had announced in response to our complaints, that using the animals was necessary. He said that the United Kingdom, which did not utilize healthy animals for surgical practice, had to come to the USA for surgical training.

    I wrote all the schools of veterinary medicine in the UK. The University of Cambridge Department of Veterinary Medicine wrote back and said “We do not practice recovery or nonrecovery surgery for student training. Rather we rely in part on cadaver surgery and participation in surgical operations under the immediate and direct supervision of trained clinicians. The Royal Veterinary College of the University of London that the practice of taking dogs and cats from pounds was not allowed in the United Kingdom. Dr. Soulsby also wrote the following: “We are sending a copy of your letter to Dr. M. W. Fox, Director, Institute for the Study of Animal Problems, Humane Society of the U.S…. Dr. Fox is also very concerned about the matter you have raised. . . . “ The Department of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Bristol and the British Veterinary Association also denied Dr. Pettit’s assertion. WSU apparently did not expect to have anyone verify/validate their practices and decisions.

    Thus, I am skeptical about WSU’s work and their statements about the same. I hope Professor Wielgus does not give up and that the news media also follow through. I’m concerned about the political pressure that must surround this case. Among other things, the academic world is getting too much money from the business world, just as legislators get pressure (and donations) from organizations wanting favors. This much information did surface in the research of the traps and drowning experiments: “University records indicate that the Fur Institute paid $243,804 for Gilbert’s work between December 1987 and November 1990.”

    No news is as old as animals’ getting screwed, along some of their would-be helpers and whistle-blowers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s