Justices deny review of case challenging polar bear habitat

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a challenge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to designate 187,000 square miles of Alaska’s coast and waters a critical habitat for the threatened polar bear.

Oil and gas trade associations, several Alaska Native corporations and villages, and the state of Alaska claimed the habitat designation was unjustifiably large. They also claimed the designation would do nothing to help conserve the polar bear.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case leaves in place a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upholding the designation.

The court gave no explanation for its decision not to hear the cases.


2 thoughts on “Justices deny review of case challenging polar bear habitat

  1. Good! Puzzling circular logic – habitat and ice is threatened by climate change because of on-the-ground human activities in the Arctic! Probably the only time they ever tried to use climate change to their advantage. And we all know that an Act can be circumvented – just look at what’s happened with the Wild Horses and Burros Act, and the Migratory Bird Act, and I’ll bet the Marine Mammal Act too for all of the military testing that goes on, and off-shore oil and wind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s