The snarling war between cattle ranchers and conservationists over wolves

By Nigel Duara Jan 24, 2018

About 23 years ago, the United States embarked on an experiment: What would happen if U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released grey wolves in the West?

The results were… mixed.

To their credit, the wolves have successfully controlled the grass-munching elk and deer populations of the Northern Rockies, leaving more habitat available for other species, like bugs and beneficial algae.

But the wolves, it turns out, aren’t that picky when it comes to dinner, and ranchers’ cows make for easy targets. So states have had to readjust. In states like Idaho, for example, ranchers are permitted to protect their herds by killing wolves, and some states also allow wolf trophy hunts in an effort to further thin the packs.

But in Oregon, ranchers have found themselves caught between a snarling rock and a hard regulation — the wolves killing cows on their grazing grounds, and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, which has strict rules against killing them in all but the rarest circumstances.

The ranchers who keep losing cattle to wolves, and the residents of Eastern Oregon who rely on the economy created by the cattle industry, have long argued the state of Oregon should loosen the rules.

And for the first time, starting last year, the state allowed for just that. But when four wolves from the Harl Butte Pack of northeastern Oregon were killed, environmentalists decried the wolf killings as unnecessary and cruel.

Still, ranchers here hope it’s just the start.

10 thoughts on “The snarling war between cattle ranchers and conservationists over wolves

  1. The wolves will never be left alone. Too many people, too many hunters, too many cattle and sheep, and too long a history of wolf hatred.

    People always hated wolves for harming domestic animals. But, according to Anglo-Saxon poets, they were also the Beasts of Battle who feasted on dead warriors. Really naughty.

    • I have always wanted to ask, with humans’ unique talent for rationalizing and viewing the world through their own reality – who was responsible for putting the dead warriors there in the first place?????

  2. Idaho wildlife “managers” are dissatisfied with the paltry annual toll on wolves (roughly 250) by hunters and trappers and now encourage killing of wolves on private land year-round. They also enacted a rule change last year which allows them to provide only an annual death count rather than a numerical tally of killing throughout the “season.” Not all hunters support the extreme persecution of wolves, but many do, and that is the constituency that wildlife “managers” serve (along with livestock “producers” on public and private land). Representative government? Don’t make me laugh.

  3. The ODFW has strict rules against killing wolves in all but ‘the rarest of circumstances”? How about at the drop of a hat, is more like it. 😦 OR has no ‘management plan’ in place the last I looked, and quite a few unexplained wolf killings. Spreading misinformation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: