Denali wolf sightings hit record low

Denali wolf (Photo courtesy of National Park Service)

Wolf sightings hit a record low along the road into Denali National Park this summer, and that’s driving wildlife advocates to push for a halt of wolf hunting and trapping on state lands along Denali’s northeastern boundary, where park road area wolves often roam, and are sometimes killed.

A report recently issued by the National Park Service, shows only 1 percent of agency wildlife survey trips along the road into Denali National Park this summer recorded wolf sightings.

Park biologist Bridget Borg says that’s the worst number since trained park observers began officially tracking wildlife sightings along the road into Denali in the mid-1990s. Viewing percentages previously ranged from as low as 3 percent and as high as 45 percent. Borg says the currently poor wolf sighting percentage is likely primarily representative of natural factors.

“Just there being a lot of variability in where wolves den, and the size of packs over the years,” she said. “Not to say there aren’t the potential for other things to influence that outside of the park.”

Biologist and wildlife advocate Rick Steiner has been trying unsuccessfully for years to get the state to close wolf hunting and trapping on state lands along Denali’s northeastern boundary. Steiner points to the damaging impact loss of an alpha wolf can have on a pack, and makes an economic argument for why the state should care, correlating recent poor wolf viewing opportunity with dips in Denali visitor numbers and spending.

“This is kind of the goose that laid the golden egg for Alaska — if we protect it and help restore it,” he said.

Half a million people visit Denali annually, but there’s state resistance to curtailing boundary area wolf harvest by a few hunters and trappers. Closure requests from Steiner and other Alaskans have been regularly turned down. Commissioner of Fish and Game Doug Vincent Lang recently rejected the second of 2 such petitions submitted since July. Commissioner’s spokesperson Rick Green explains why.

“Data from the Parks Service isn’t a very specified area, and when we manage we manage more of a habitat area — much larger scale — and haven’t seen the evidence to constitute an emergency on the wolf population,” he said.

Green says that means it’s an allocation issue and up to the game board, which has consistently failed to grant requests to re-establish a no wolf kill area, scrapped by the board in 2010. In a July interview, game board chair Ted Spraker pointed to wolves’ resilience, and the potential for wolf viewing to rebound.

“It could all change next year if one of these eastern packs dens close to the road,” he said.

But halting wolf hunting and trapping in the nearby northeast boundary area could also help, according to the Park Service’s Borg. She points to better wolf viewing during a decade long span when boundary area wolf harvest was closed.

“When the area adjacent to the park was closed to hunting and trapping, it was correlated with higher sightings, so we think that bears replication to see if there’s a similar effect,” she said.

The park service and wildlife advocates have submitted separate northeast park boundary no wolf kill buffer proposals to the game board for consideration at a March 2020 meeting, but any change would take place after the wolf trapping season.  Steiner is pushing for an emergency game board meeting prior to the November first start of trapping season.

7 thoughts on “Denali wolf sightings hit record low

  1. My wish for someone like this is to have him left in a trap in the wilderness for a week, while the wolves, bears, ravens and carrion beetles have at him. The wolves can lift a leg.

  2. From the 2011 USFWS Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife Associated Recreation (FHWAR) report for Alaska. As one can easily see, the Commission is not interested in what is economically best for Alaska, nor what will serve the interests of the greatest number of people. It’s perpetuating a dying old boys’ club regardless of negative impact.

    Hunters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125,000
    Days of hunting………………. 1,336,000
    Average days per hunter ………… 11
    Total expenditures…………….. $424,803,000
    Trip-related ………………. $167,664,000
    Equipment and other ………… $257,139,000
    Average per hunter ……………. $3,281
    Average trip expenditure per day ….. $125

    Total wildlife-watching participants . 640,000
    Away-from-home participants….. 498,000
    Around-the-home participants….. 229,000
    Days of participation away from home……. 5,159,000
    Average days of participation away from home ………….. 10
    Total expenditures……………. $2,058,355,000
    Trip-related ……………… $1,970,345,000
    Equipment and other ……….. $88,010,000
    Average per participant ………… $3,206
    Average trip expenditure per ……….. $382

  3. When has the “great” state of Alaska ever had an ounce of caring for wolves. They used to be gunned down from helicopters. It defies logic and the stats above, courtesy of Annie, show the disconnect. Lisa Murkowski plays a huge role in these decisions. It’s been just an endless nightmare for wolves.

  4. Unfortunately, too many so-called animal protection/wildlife groups have become collaborators and “stakeholders” with game agencies, along with alliances with hunters, which has happened here in NM. Some of us are fighting this dangerous trend, which does not help wildlife, and only legitimizes & condones the continuing slaughter of hunting and trapping.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s