A Giant Organic Farm Faces Criticism That It’s Harming The Environment


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flipboard
  • Email

May 3, 20214:04 PM ETHeard on All Things Considered

DAN CHARLESTwitterLISTEN· 4:124-Minute ListenAdd toPLAYLIST

Wind-blown soil fills a ditch between a road and the fields of Gunsmoke Farms, a large organic farm northwest of Pierre, S.D., in early March.Stringer

Hardly a week goes by, it seems, without a big food company making promises to deliver products from green, sustainable farms. Turning those promises into reality, though, can be complicated.

Take Gunsmoke Farms, a vast property that covers 53 square miles just northwest of Pierre, S.D. The food company General Mills, maker of Cheerios, announced in 2018 that it would convert the farm to organic production. The company planned to turn it into an educational hub to teach other farmers “how to implement organic and regenerative agriculture practices.”

Now, some of Gunsmoke Farms’ neighbors say that the farm is doing more environmental harm than good.

Among the critics is Dwayne Beck, a soil scientist who manages South Dakota State University’s Dakota Lakes Research Station, 40 miles east of Gunsmoke Farms. Beck was skeptical about the project from the beginning. “It scared me, because normally organic [farming] entails lots of tillage, and those soils are very fragile,” he said.

Farmers often till the soil — breaking it up with tools such as chisel plows or disks — to uproot weeds and get land ready for planting. But tillage also tears soil loose from the plant roots that help hold it together and also breaks down parts of the soil that are most rich in carbon and nutrients.Article continues after sponsor messagehttps://4df503c1e72eef0faa09f6db82733d6a.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

This is especially true of soils where Gunsmoke Farms is located, Beck said. The area developed from an ancient ocean floor, and the soil is full of clay. “Once you disturb it, nothing holds that soil together. It just turns into powder,” he said, vulnerable to rain or wind that can carry it away.

This used to happen regularly in western South Dakota. Beck recalls dust storms so thick, cars crashed because drivers couldn’t see vehicles just in front of them.

South Dakota was one of the places that saw severe soil erosion from wind during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Those dust storms happen less often now because over the past two decades, many farmers in the region abandoned regular tillage. They now use planting equipment that slices into undisturbed soil and places seed in the ground.

To control weeds, these farmers use herbicides. But chemical weed control isn’t an option for an organic business such as Gunsmoke Farms.

During the farm’s three-year transition to organic status, its managers grew primarily alfalfa, which doesn’t require annual planting. In 2020, though, they planted their first crops of wheat and peas, which involved tilling the enormous fields.

Months later, Beck said his fears were realized. He collected photographs of the damage: small drifts of wind-blown soil in a roadside ditch, and a country road that disappears into a brown cloud of blowing dust. “The soil that blew out of there, it will never be the same as it was before it blew,” he said. It won’t have the stability and structure of healthy soil, held in place by the roots of plants.

Beck and others who live near Gunsmoke Farms said that nonorganic farmers also struggled to control soil erosion in 2020 because of drought and high winds. But the problems at Gunsmoke, they said, were worse. A planting of winter wheat, which was supposed to protect the soil on those fields, failed to grow well.

When the Gunsmoke project was just getting off the ground, in 2018, an expert from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service drew up a soil conservation plan for the farm. That plan called for wide strips of native grasses across the farm to help prevent soil from blowing, and for the steepest slopes to stay covered, most years, with crops such as alfalfa that don’t require annual planting.

Gary Zimmer, an expert on organic farming who collaborated with General Mills in launching the Gunsmoke project, said that he drew up a plan that incorporated many of these measures. But he said much of his plan was never implemented.

“It’s in a deep hole,” Zimmer said, referring to the farm. “I don’t know how you get it back out organically. It’s hard to farm organically if you do it really well, and have your intensive management. But 30,000 acres, poorly managed, is a really good sign for failure.”

General Mills doesn’t own Gunsmoke Farms or control it directly. It signed a “strategic sourcing agreement” with an investment firm called TPG Sixth Street Partners, an affiliate of the firm TPG, which acquired the land in order to supply General Mills with organic wheat, peas and other crops. Sixth Street later became an independent operation, and it currently owns Gunsmoke. The investors have hired a series of managers to run the farm.

General Mills said in a statement to NPR that turning Gunsmoke Farms into a thriving ecosystem “is a journey” and promised continued efforts to minimize erosion and improve soil health there.

Sixth Street Partners said in its statement that the farm is “early in the process of regenerating land” and that its mission — organic farming — also provides additional environmental benefits, such as lower use of pesticides and synthetic fertilizer.

Ruth Beck, who’s married to Dwayne Beck, spent many years as an extension agronomist with South Dakota State University, advising farmers in the area around Gunsmoke Farms. She said it’s simply difficult to grow crops organically, on a large scale, in this semi-arid part of the country. “You know, we’ve got to figure out ways to do that, if that’s what people want,” she said. “But we aren’t there yet.”

At Gunsmoke, she said, environmental marketing got ahead of what farmers can actually do

Urban environmentalism has failed — it’s time for new perspective



Urban environmentalism has failed — it's time for new perspective

© Getty Images

At the start of Biden’s presidency, he signed an executive order promising to protect 30 percent of American land and water by the year 2030. 

Last week, congressional Democrats and Republicans sent separate letters asking for the administration for clarity on the implementation of this promise. The 30×30 goal is admirable and important for environmental protection, but its execution has the potential to shine light on the divide between urban and rural environmentalism. 

For decades, the term “environmentalist” has been associated with urban activists marching in city streets, holding signs that demand the abolition of fossil fuels. The fact is urban environmentalism has failed us. Urbanites prescribe climate solutions from ivory towers while rural Americans have the most to lose.

In the past few years, the Green New Deal and similar policy has dominated the climate change conversation. Unless you agree that we have less than 12 years to completely solve our environmental challenges, your views are largely dismissed by progressive climate hawks. That said, the Green New Deal — since its rise to fame in early 2019 — has done nothing to reduce emissions. It never will because it will never realistically pass both chambers of Congress and earn a presidential signature. For the record, even if the legislation were to defy all odds, we don’t need an economic restructuring to solve climate change. Instead, we need a new climate perspective.

Although I was raised in Wisconsin, I currently live in Seattle — one of the urban communities that often overlooks the concerns of middle America (and even the middle of its own state). Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) is lauded as a climate champion in progressive circles, but it only takes a brief glance at his record to see that it’s all talk and no action. Meanwhile, Americans in the middle of the country are putting climate solutions to action. I saw this firsthand while traveling the country this fall in places like LouisianaWisconsin and South Dakota.

These important American communities — and specifically rural communities — have been left behind in all the talk of ambitious net-zero emission goals and the Green New Deal. Rural Americans, often farmers, ranchers or outdoorsmen interact with our natural environment in a meaningful way each and every day. Unlike urban communities, which rightfully care about the health of our planet but remain detached from its realities, these Americans have firsthand experience of conserving land and wildlife. Yet, they haven’t led the charge on environmental issues for years. This must change.

It’s all too easy for us conservatives to throw our hands up and lament the state of the climate conversation. It’s all too easy to give up and allow talks to continue to be dominated by the loudest, angriest voices in the room. In fact, there’s even a name for this tendency. But, we simply can’t give into that temptation. We can’t deny that climate change is a problem because we don’t like the progressive solutions being peddled.

No, instead, we should look at this as an incredible opportunity to reclaim what being an environmentalist means. Environmentalism means standing up for local communities and stakeholders who know best how to solve the issues in their backyards. American environmentalism means putting our nation first and using our incredible history of ingenuity and innovation to set an example for the rest of the world.

We need a new environmental perspective. We need rural Americans’ voices to be amplified in the conversation. If we don’t take advantage of the opportunity to be a part of this conversation, we will continue to be taken advantage of by urban environmentalists in activism, the Democratic politicians who represent them in elections and other nations on the global stage.

Benji Backer is the founder and president of the American Conservation Coalition (ACC).


What an interesting web we weave.  For decades now PETA and environmentalists have looked down on hunters and have called them every name you can think of except wanted and needed.

Well that could all change, MSN is reporting that there is a decline in the number of hunters in our nation and the consequences could hurt their causes.

According to  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service data hunting license sales have fallen from a peak of about 17 million in the early ’80s to 15 million last year.  In fact, according to a U.S. Fish and Wildlife agency their 2016 survey pointed to an even deeper decline of 11.5 million Americans who say they hunt, down more than 2 million licensees from five years earlier.

“The downward trends are clear”

So what are PETA and the environmentalist concerned about since they are achieving their stated goals?  Well, the decline in hunting licenses means a decline in cash and now that is resulting in some pretty large financial shortfalls in many state wildlife agencies.

I remember reporting on the state of California forcing people to conserve water.  That worked so well they saw a precipitous decline in cash coming into their waterworks departments so they had to increase their rates greatly.

The article stated the following:

In Wisconsin, a $4 million to $6 million annual deficit forced the state’s Department of Natural Resources to reduce warden patrols and invasive species control.

Michigan’s legislature had to dig into general-tax coffers to save some of the state’s wildlife projects, while other key programs, such as protecting bees and other pollinating creatures, remain “woefully underfunded,” according to Edward Golder, a spokesman for the state’s natural resources department.

Some states, including Missouri, are redirecting sales tax revenue to conservation.

Here in Pennsylvania — where the game commission gets more than 50 percent of its revenue from licenses, permits and taxes — the agency had to cancel construction projects, delay vehicle purchases and leave dozens of positions vacant, according to a 2016 report, even as it tackled West Nile virus and tried to protect rare creatures such as the wood rat.

So now what are people are calling for, well I told you what happened in California when it came to their water rates.  Now a national panel has called for a new funding model to keep at-risk species from needing far costlier emergency measures.

Interesting what happens when people get what they want and have strived for decades to achieve.  Apparently they never really look fully at the consequences of their actions, kind of like teenagers if I remember those years of being one and raising them.

The Live with Renk show airs Monday through Friday 9 a.m. to noon, to let me know your thoughts call (269) 441-9595

Read More: Shortage Of Hunters Has Environmentalists Concerned | https://wbckfm.com/shortage-of-hunters-has-environmentalists-concerned/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral

EPA Reverses Approval of Deadly ‘Cyanide Bombs’ After Public Outcry


Trump’s U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reversed a decision made last week to reauthorize the use of deadly cyanide traps used to kill wild animals that threaten agriculturethe Associated Press reported Thursday.

The traps, officially called M-44s but nicknamed “cyanide bombs,” are spring-loaded devices that kill their targets with a discharge of sodium cyanide, according to The Guardian. They are used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Wildlife Services to kill animals like foxes and coyotes that farmers and ranchers consider pests. But critics say that they cause long-term pollution and harm more than their intended targets, even killing pets and injuring humans, HuffPost explained.

“I am announcing a withdrawal of EPA’s interim registration review decision on sodium cyanide, the compound used in M-44 devices to control wild predators,” EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said in a statement released Thursday.

Kierán Suckling@KieranSuckling

Great News: Under withering public criticism, the @EPA today withdrew its August 10th approval of wildlife-killing cyanide bombs.

EPA press release here: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/statement-epa-administrator-wheeler-m-44-predator-control-devices  https://twitter.com/KieranSuckling/status/1160375189827272705 

Statement by EPA Administrator Wheeler on M-44, Predator Control Devices | US EPA

EPA News Release: Statement by EPA Administrator Wheeler on M-44, Predator Control Devices


Kierán Suckling@KieranSuckling

BREAKING: Trump EPA approves inhumane cyanide bombs.

Feds killed 6,579 foxes, coyotes, bears, racoons, dogs, etc. with them in 2018; 13,232 in 2017. Decline due to suits by @CenterForBioDiv @wildearthguard @HumaneSociety requiring new federal review. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/10/us/cyanide-bombs-animals-trump-administration.html 

72 people are talking about this

The agency’s decision last week to allow continued use of the traps until a study on their impacts was completed in 2021 sparked a firestorm of complaints. The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) told HuffPost that 99.9 percent of all comments sent to the EPA about the traps opposed them.

“I’m thrilled that the EPA just reversed its wrongheaded decision to reauthorize deadly cyanide traps,” CBD Carnivore Conservation Director Collette Adkins said in a statement to HuffPost. “So many people expressed their outrage, and the EPA seems to be listening. I hope the feds finally recognize the need for a permanent ban to protect people, pets and imperiled wildlife from this poison.”

Predator Defense Executive Director Brooks Fahy also credited public outrage with the EPA’s reversal.

“Obviously somebody at EPA is paying attention to the public’s concerns about cyanide bombs,” Fahy said in a statement reported by The Guardian. “It would appear they’re responding to public outrage over the interim decision from last week. Our phone has been ringing off the hook from concerned citizens regarding their greenlight to continue using these horrific devices. We’ll have to see how this plays out.”

Wolf Conservation Center


The Trump administration reversed its decision to use ‘cyanide bombs’ to kill wild animals!
Big thanks to @PredatorDefense for fighting for this! https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/aug/15/epa-cyanide-bombs-trump-m44s?CMP=share_btn_tw 

Trump administration reverses decision to use ‘cyanide bombs’ to kill wild animals

The poison-filled traps are used by the federal government to kill coyotes, foxes and other animals for farmers and ranchers


665 people are talking about this

The traps are deadly to both their intended and unintended targets. Of the more than 1.5 million native wild animals killed by Wildlife Services in 2018, around 6,500 of them were killed by the traps. In 2017, the traps killed around 13,200 wild animals, the Associated Press reported.

In one tragic incident recounted by HuffPost, one of the traps went off in Pocatello, Idaho in 2017 while 14-year-old Canyon Mansfield was walking his dog Casey. Casey died, and Mansfield was rushed to the hospital. He eventually recovered, and his parents are suing the USDA.

Wildlife Services stopped using the traps in Idaho after the incident, and in Colorado following a lawsuit. Cyanide bombs are currently banned in Oregon.


‘s Pick to Head Blocked Report Warning of Risk to 1,000+ Endangered Species http://ow.ly/Me5G30oduBo  @bpncamp @EricLiptonNYT

Trump’s Pick to Head Interior Blocked Report Warning of Pesticide Risk to 1,000+ Endangered Species

Acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt faces a Senate confirmation hearing Thursday.


29 people are talking about this

UPDATED: Rep. Shea’s secret group discussed sending severed wolf tail and testicles to environmental activist

Bosworth suggested sending severed wolf parts to environmental activist Kierán Suckling. - GARY KRAMER/USFWS PHOTO

Gary Kramer/USFWS photo
Bosworth suggested sending severed wolf parts to environmental activist Kierán Suckling.

This article has been updated to correct who sent the screenshot with Suckling’s address information, link to the response from Redoubt News, and include the statement from the source who leaked the Signal messages.

By now, Rep. Matt Shea (R-Spokane Valley) and his allies definitely know the name Kierán Suckling. As executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, Suckling has repeatedly been at the opposite side of some of the most heated controversies in Shea’s world. It was Suckling’s group who was battling Cliven Bundy, the cattle rancher who’s defiance led to an armed standoff in 2014. When right-wing militants occupied the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, it was Suckling who showed up to counterprotest. And lately, it’s been Suckling’s group that has been pushing litigation to protect wolves in Washington state.

“Since the ’90s, we have been exposing the connection between anti-environmentalists and the militias and the white supremacist movement,” Suckling says. “These are part and parcel of the same world view.”

Rep. Matt Shea hates wolves, and he’s not too fond of being tied to white supremacists. (Though that didn’t stop him from linking to a white nationalist website to slam a journalist he disliked.)

And so perhaps it’s not surprising that when Shea’s allies discussed targeting specific individuals with the state legislator on the private messaging app Signal, Suckling’s name came up.

The plan being brainstormed? Send the guy severed wolf parts.

Last month, Guardian journalist Jason Wilson wrote a story based on some of these leaked Signal messages, as Shea’s allies reveled in detailed fantasies of violence against local Spokane residents. The revelations sparked bipartisan condemnation in the Washington state Legislature.

Among other moments, Three Percenter Anthony Bosworth — the guy who Shea feted with a “2016 Patriot of the Year” award and sent down to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge as a “security specialist” to “de-escalate” the standoff — discussed targeting alleged “antifa” members by confronting their parents, their workplaces, their landlords and targeting their “safe spaces”… “while they’re out on the streets rioting.”

“If we can catch a few of them alone and work him over a little bit,” Bosworth wrote, according to the Guardian. While Shea was not quoted directly encouraging violence, he offered to help run background checks for those who were.

In the Spokesman-Review, Bosworth characterized his comments as mere angry venting. The Spokesman reported that many of the comments were made in the lead-up to Nov. 4, 2017, which right-wing groups incorrectly believed would be a day of far-left violence. But previously unpublished chat messages obtained by the Inlander showed that discussions of targeting political opponents continued after the rumored “Antifa Civil War” date fizzled without an incident.

The discussion about targeting Suckling begins on Dec. 12, 2017. Bosworth, using the screen name “Scout,” wants to send Suckling a message.

The image that Anthony Bosworth suggested sending to Suckling, along with severed wolf parts. - SIGNAL SCREENCAP

Signal screencap
The image that Anthony Bosworth suggested sending to Suckling, along with severed wolf parts.

Bosworth posts a picture of a skull and crossbones along with “смерть,” the Russian word for death. The image was the symbol of the Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine (1918), an anarchist guerrilla force that fought against both the Communist Reds and the establishment Whites in the Russian Civil War. Shea’s group had discussed using the symbol as a calling card.

“As far as I’m concerned we can send one of these and a wolf tail to Suckling,” Bosworth writes to the group. “Suckling would make sure it made national news.”

One of the other group members — Jay Pounder, the source who leaked the Signal conversations to the Guardian — posts a screenshot of Suckling’s address and contact information.

“OK, do we have anybody up north to get us a tail?” Bosworth responds.

A redacted version of Suckling's address and contact information, shared in the group with Shea. - SIGNAL SCREENCAP

Signal screencap
A redacted version of Suckling’s address and contact information, shared in the group with Shea.

Pounder then floats the name of Cope Reynolds, a Three Percenter and a gun rights activist who, like Suckling, is based in Arizona. (If you’re assuming Reynolds uses the Confederate flag as his Facebook banner image, you’d be correct.)

“Well, if Cope crossed a wolf he’d smoke it himself,” Bosworth responded.

“These transplanted wolf packs can be traced back through DNA,” Bosworth writes. “Get me the testicles off a North Idaho wolf and I’ll send it to him.”

A dozen minutes later on Signal, Shea — using the screen name Verumbellator — gives Bosworth a warning. To be clear, he doesn’t warn Bosworth that he shouldn’t cut the tail and testicles off a North Idaho wolf corpse to send to environmental activist along with a skull and crossbones.

Instead, he warns Bosworth that they shouldn’t talk about this stuff electronically, and instead they should do it face-to-face.

“This is not something to put out electronically,” Shea writes. “We need to meet f2f.”

(Shea is frequently cautious about information security, once telling a crowd that there are “private investigators that work for the Republican establishment, that actually use technology to hack into your phone.”)

“Roger,” Bosworth responds. And with that, he drops the subject.

It’s possible, of course, that Shea met Bosworth to discourage him from sending a threatening package. But Suckling is skeptical: Why would Shea want to take the conversation offline to tell Bosworth he shouldn’t threaten Suckling.

Either way, Suckling says, he’s never had anyone deliver him anything resembling a wolf tail and testicles. But he argues that just the fact that it was discussed is revealing. In an email, he explained:

“Threatening to mutilate a wolf and mail its bloody body parts is outright psychotic. But it won’t scare the Center for Biological Diversity, it makes us fight harder for the endangered species and people Matt Shea has declared war on. He’s a textbook example of how racism, sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance, animal abuse, and anti-environmentalism go hand in hand. Shea should resign or be impeached immediately. His paranoid self-dealing authoritarianism has no place in American democracy.”

Shea’s legislative assistant, Rene’ Holaday, responded to a request for comment with this statement:

“Thank you for writing to the office of Rep. Matt Shea. Rep. Shea is out of town on a Missions trip serving the Lord, and won’t be back for several more days.”

As Shea rarely speaks to the local reporters, instead preferring to bash them from a distance after the story has come out, the Inlander does not anticipate the state representative agreeing to answer questions when he returns. If he does, we will update the story.

Bosworth has so far not agreed to a phone interview with the Inlander, but in an email sent Tuesday morning, he offered the following statement:

“Here’s what I have to say about Wolves and Fine Cigars , ‘smokem if you got them'”

The eco-terrorists can stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

Suckling, meanwhile, acknowledges he’s been arrested in civil disobedience actions before, including chaining himself to trees and occupying politician and developer offices, but stresses that these actions were nonviolent.

In that vein, no evidence has surfaced to suggest that Bosworth, Shea or the other members of the Signal chat undertook any of the violent or threatening tactics discussed. Still, the chats are rife with fantasies about violence and destruction toward various individuals and businesses.

“When the Patriot Revolution starts I know what store I’m burning to the ground,” Bosworth writes in a Signal message, linking to a search for “Antifa” products at Walmart.

And Bosworth has become violent in the past, including allegedly getting into a fistfight at a funeral.

Kierán Suckling, director of the Center for Biological Diversity. - COURTESY OF KIERÁN SUCKLING

Courtesy of Kierán Suckling
Kierán Suckling, director of the Center for Biological Diversity.

Suckling says his group has been the victim of arson and violence before.

“We’ve had the militia show up at our office and try to get inside,” Suckling says. “We’ve had a truck [torched] in our parking lot. We’ve had people beaten up over the years.”

He says he won’t be dissuaded by the tactics of Shea and his allies.

“We have to push on and never let this thing deter us from saving endangered species,” Suckling says. “If there’s anything worth dying over it’s stopping the mass extinction that’s going on with this planet right now.”

But not, to Suckling at least, worth killing over.


As of Wednesday morning, Bosworth sent the Inlander link to a post by Redoubt News, a far-right blog that champions the patriot right. It notes that the first version of the Inlander blog incorrectly identified who shared Suckling’s contact information, and also accuses Pounder of using “willing, radical, left-wing extremists to further his own personal grudges against Matt Shea and his friends” and of “using extreme violent rhetoric himself.” It does not, however, provide any proof that the Guardian‘s source had used that rhetoric, nor does it provide any clarity for why Shea wanted to meet Bosworth face-to-face to discuss his wolf-package proposal. (Pounder denies using the incendiary rhetoric quoted by Redoubt News.)

On Wednesday, Pounder released a lengthy statement on Facebook explaining why he leaked the Signal messages. He denies that he was trying to set Shea up — instead, he says that he gradually became disillusioned with the Shea organization and eventually decided to speak up.

Dear Friends,

Right now we face an unprecedented threat to the public safety and security of the Pacific Northwest and that is all due to the threat of Christian Identity Politics, what is that you ask? Check out this article from Christianity Today’s Editor in Chief Mark Galli: https://bit.ly/2DHGxyC

Why this is important and relevant right now, I’ll start in with a scripture… because this week I’ve read many times and it keeps speaking to me;

2 Chronicles 16:7-9: “At that time Hanani the seer came to Asa king of Judah and said to him: “Because you relied on the king of Aram and not on the LORD your God, the army of the king of Aram has escaped from your hand. 8 Were not the Cushites[b] and Libyans a mighty army with great numbers of chariots and horsemen[c]? Yet when you relied on the LORD, he delivered them into your hand. 9 For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him. You have done a foolish thing, and from now on you will be at war. 10 Asa was angry with the seer because of this; he was so enraged that he put him in prison. At the same time Asa brutally oppressed some of the people.”

Consider that last verse, “Asa was angry with the seer because of this; he was so enraged that he put him in prison. At the same time Asa brutally oppressed some of the people.”

Well as some of you have read and heard that a series of articles and chats that I was privy to that I released several NW media outlets regarding the activities of a State Rep Matt Shea that I used to be involved with several years ago.

I want to make it evidently clear. I parted ways with State Rep Matt Shea due to his headlong full barrel decent into the world and ideologies of Christian Identity politics and Dominionism. I feel that at the time I followed proper Biblical protocol in addressing what I was seeing and hearing from Matthew and what at that time I considered “my people”. He may differ in opinion. While I volunteered with him, I was caught up in the ideas of identity politics and didn’t know it until God showed me what true freedom and liberty are really about.

I thought I was on the side of what was right, I thought that God was going to use us to save and help the community in the Pacific Northwest to give glory to His name and help bring about a restoration of faith and hope should things get really bad in the world.

Yes, did I say things that I am not proud of because I thought that I was doing God’s will? Yes.

Have I ever done anything illegal? No.

Are they attempting to smear me on alternative media sites with false statements and negative information? Yes, but I forgive them.

Have I gone to those individuals I sinned against and asked forgiveness of them for my words and made it right? Yes I did that a long time ago.

I have because it’s the Biblical thing to do and I know it was the right thing to do. Doing the right thing is incredibly hard to do, but forgiveness is divine and grace is amazing for all that accept it.

Does Matt and his associates believe they are doing the right thing in God’s name? Yes, but in my opinion, this couldn’t be further from what we know to be Christ’s great commission.

In my opinion, Matthew, the Church at Marble Community Fellowship near Northport WA and anyone tied to his spiritual ideology are focused on one thing and one thing; The sheer use of raw power and fear to achieve their political and spiritual ideology that only Christians should lead the United States of America. This is Christian Identity Politics and Dominionism in its purest form and it is dangerous. It’s also idolatry to put politics before the Lord. I am going to reference the following statement by a quote by the aforementioned article on this;

“Yes, a nation is better served by laws influenced by Christian ethics, and yes, we are obliged by love to persuade others of the wisdom of Christian ethics; but we cannot “insist on our own way” (1 Cor. 13:5) by forcing unbelievers to submit to our morals. Yes, borders should be secure, but they can go hand in hand with a generous immigration policy. Yes, every nation is graced with favor from God but also is subject to God’s judgment.”

The focus of Christian Identity politics is to force people to subscribe under pain of death (according to Matt’s Biblical Basis For War and the Remnant Resolves) to the belief in Christianity and should you not, you are the enemy and are demonized for being an “atheist”, “communist”, “Pegan”, “Social Justice Warrior”, “leftwing liberal”, “Benedict Arnold” who must associate with “Antifa” and should be put to death under the Dominionistic / Christian Identity ideology.

Once I uncovered this, I could not and would not stand for those ideals. That is why I released the chats. No one should be subjected to those types of ideals. God loves all.

Why have I kept quiet about this you might ask? Well out of heavy safety concerns for my family and those I hold dear. I had hoped the local media would be able to bring about the truth and that anyone reading this would have already seen and understood that this behavior and ideology is wrong.

By bringing this to the forefront I beg that you all read and understand that this isn’t Christianity. I also hope that by being more public with my statement on this, should anything happen to me or my family or those I hold dearest, those in this movement would be held severely accountable for their actions. We don’t anticipate this, God is sovereign, but this is a rebellion against their theology and now I have gone against “Asa”.

Have I contacted legal counsel should I need it? Yes. I hope to never have to bring any lawsuits against anyone for harassment or physical intimidation. God is sovereign.

My God, our God is a God of love and forgiveness and wants all of you to know that you are loved, and he doesn’t want to kill you if you don’t believe in him. He is not going to bring about civil war and he certainly isn’t going to come on the clouds and bless the USA should the entire sitting body of the government be Christian in belief. Is there a deeper conversation to be had about faith, grace and redemption and what that means, sure, but those conversations are best left for quiet private conversations and to allow the Holy Spirit to work in the hearts of those being talked with.

It is not for us to judge race, creed, ethnicity, sex, orientation or belief. It is for us to love our neighbor and to show them Christ’s love. Everyone is our neighbor and we are instructed to love our neighbor as yourself and not force our neighbor believe like we believe. Once we realize that, then we can allow the holy spirit work and bring about true freedom and spiritual liberty. This cannot and should not be done through force of action or threat of death.

Do I still love Matthew, his associates, Barry and Anne Byrd and the rest of the Marble fellowship people? Yes, absolutely I do, but I still struggle daily with doing this. We are called to love your enemy and pray for those who persecute you (Matt 5:44). I don’t view these people as my enemy but because I am human I have to work each day to love the sinner and hate the sin. I grieve the fact that they would rather demonize someone who doesn’t believe like them rather than engaging in a dialog that could lead to an extraordinary moment. I believe that through pain/struggle, comes healing and restoration and that is what our region and our country needs most right now. We don’t need anger, we don’t need hate, we don’t need division. This has to stop.

In closing, I hope that as you have read this statement you understand that I am not the same man who thought he was serving the right cause, but now stand in front of you begging you to see that the leadership in Olympia represented in the Spokane Valley area is on a path that will spiritually destroy people and soul of this region. Left unchecked it will also physically destroy it someday as well if their plan is enacted.

Some will read this and view this as a political stunt. It isn’t, it’s so much bigger than just the man in office. Yes, this does have major political ramifications, but this is about the soul of the area. Christian Identity Politics and Dominionism has no place in our region, it does not fulfill the great commission. It does not encourage healthy dialog between groups who believe differently. It does not encourage those without a voice to speak up and it certainly doesn’t bring people together to work towards better communities. It goes against everything this country was founded on.

Know that what you feel is right, this isn’t ok. Go with your heart, do what’s right and know that you are loved by the King of the Universe who has a plan for your life despite whatever your background may be.

Special Note: This will be my only statement on this situation, I will take no media inquiries nor answer any questions or engage in nonproductive dialog regarding this post. Any and all threats regarding this post, attempts at physical intimidation, veiled threats to my business ventures will all be forwarded to my council for consideration and prosecution should the need be.

Health Care and the Environment

by Stephen Capra
The last few weeks have shown a new depth in Republican thinking. What would at first glance seem crazy, stealing heath care from up to 24 million Americans is at best going to be a very close vote that will likely mean less for average Americans and more tax cuts for the wealthiest in our country.

To accomplish this Republicans are willing to lie repeatedly, obfuscate and threaten. They will use misleading facts and create fear among the most vulnerable, to cajole their way to this warped vision of victory.

So when a party that dominates both Houses of Congress and the Presidency is willing to literally kill people to gain a tax cut, what is the potential that they will have concern or a sense of responsibility when it comes to the environment?

The answer is unfolding before our eyes. From Bear Ears and Monuments across the West to the fight on Climate Change or methane releases and the countless environmental regulations they have placed in the shredder, we are witnessing genocide of the planet on a level that few can remember. Republicans continue to use terms like freedom and choice to conceal and define a narrative that enriches corporate American off the backs of native wildlife, protected habitat and the health and welfare of people that love and respect wild nature.

Democrats in this process are fighting back, but also share some of the responsibility in the delays and Blue Dog member’s conflicts with important environmental legislation that stalled or was not implemented through Executive Orders until the final year of an Administration, regulations that should have passed in year one.

It has taken the Trump Administration 100 days to tack public opinion against environmental protection and to inspire this congress to go for the jugular in destroying generations of responsible environmental progress. While many in America are fighting back and town hall videos represent new voices of hope, we remain trapped with a President that has shown his shallowness, his vindictive nature and his willingness to destroy the foundations of our democracy. In his disturbed mind, he sees only those loyal to him and those who oppose him. Friendship and critical analysis are fed through money and his ability to profit. Dissension is met with paranoia and callous retribution.

So we stand at a precipice in time. In the next forty days a report will come back that could very well be the paper work the President desires to remove some of our most precious lands from Monument protection. What on the surface seems to be a very misguided and unthinkable prospect is in the Trump world another opportunity to harm those who most vehemently opposed him in the campaign-the conservation community. For those in the Steve Bannon inner circle, it is another way to blow up the Federal government, leading us towards an inevitable anarchy.

So the question for many remains what can we do? The answer is to first, never stop fighting. The second is to realize that we are approaching the bottom, many have spoken about. It is true Trump could move to disband our National Parks, but that is something that for now seems a remote possibility. No this President is trying to break our spirit and push us into a national depression that will force people to tune out and give him free reign. Next we must continue to educate ourselves, friends and family, it is simply amazing how many people are already tuned out. Finally, we must vote out these bastards, our planet simply cannot continue a cycle of bust and boom in terms of protection of our natural heritage, we are approaching life support and that demands our energy and perseverance. We can never surrender to evil, or ignorance.

This Republican Congress is making clear from Health Care to the removal of James Comey, that they are putting party first before the American people and our values. Power and control are the mechanisms that feed their trough and what was once considered a sacred responsibility to put county before party, has been destroyed in the haze of Citizens United and the thirst to move their radical agenda.

Should Democrats retake control of congress or eventually the White House, they must move in the first, not the eighth year of a Presidency to change environmental regulations or use Executive Actions so that they have a sense of permanency. Democrats must also be strong, not weak, in pushing aggressive environmental protections, wilderness and Monument protections and designations. That includes those in coal country.

Until such time as the American people fight in one voice to protect our environment, Republicans will continue to flourish from the poisoned money that flows from the fossil fuel, mining, NRA and corporate agenda. That money is breaking the Arctic ice packs, fouling our air and water, it is killing wolves in the West and Mid-West, and it is stealing protected lands from all Americans and allowing a deranged man to lead our county, while simultaneously tearing us apart.

We can do so much better, and we will. But we are in a war, there really is no other way to describe it and we have no choice but to fight with every fiber of our being. For those in the rust belt that made Trump our President, I would remind them that their vote and actions are helping to destroy our quality of life in the West. So we can fight one another, or we can unite to save our planet, our wildlife and the moral compass of a nation that has lost direction.

Get out into the Parks and Monuments, allow your spirit to heal and flourish, soak in the energy and life that nature provides, in that place of love and beauty, find the strength and resolve to save it from those who can never understand or fear that which is wild.

The road is long, but you are not alone, we are many and fierce in our love of that cathedral of life, that endless bounty that is nature.

We will fight and we will win.

But we will also suffer and hurt, yet in that pain is the resolve to never allow this to happen again. The health, not just of people, but of the planet is in our hands.
In such destiny is the power to change, and change we must or we will bear witness to our own demise.
I choose to fight.

Obama blocked this controversial Alaskan gold mine. Trump just gave it new life.

May 12 at 7:37 AM

The Environmental Protection Agency has reached a legal settlement with a Canadian company hoping to build a massive gold, copper and molybdenum mine in Alaska’s Bristol Bay watershed, clearing the way for the firm to apply for federal permits.

The settlement reached late Thursday between the EPA and the Pebble Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., could revive a controversial project that was effectively scuttled under the Obama administration. And it underscores how President Trump’s commitment to support mining extends far beyond coal, to gold, copper and other minerals.

While the move does not grant immediate approval to the Pebble Mine project,which will have to undergo a federal environmental review and also clear state hurdles before any construction takes place, it reverses the agency’s 2014 determination that a large-scale mine in the area be barred because it would imperil the region’s valuable sockeye salmon fishery.

In a statement, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said that the agreement “will not guarantee or prejudge a particular outcome, but will provide Pebble a fair process for their permit application and help steer EPA away from costly and time-consuming litigation.”

“We are committed to due process and the rule of law, and regulations that are ‘regular’,” said EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt.  “We understand how much the community cares about this issue, with passionate advocates on all sides … We are committed to listening to all voices as this process unfolds.”


A coalition of fishing operators, native Alaskans, environmentalists and local businesses have fought the mine proposal for more than a decade, ever since Northern Dynasty Minerals began exploring for minerals in 2004. While this area in southwestern Alaska contains a reservoir of gold worth an estimated $120 billion, its pockmarked lakes and tributaries feed into the headwaters of Bristol Bay, home to a fishery that generates $500 million a year.

In 2014 the EPA invoked a rarely used clause of the Clean Water Act, 404(c), to issue a proposed determination that the company could not apply to the Army Corps of Engineers for any permits because a massive mine could have “significant” and potentially “catastrophic” impacts on the region.

Alannah Hurley, executive director of the United Tribes of Bristol Bay, said in an interview that opponents of the mine “are outraged that this is happening.”

“If there’s damage to the watershed and the fisheries, then it would be devastating to our identity as indigenous people,” Hurley said, adding that tribes and other local residents “invited” the EPA to intervene on the issue. “For the company to paint it as federal intervention is completely misleading. The people of Bristol Bay basically cried out to EPA to help us.”

The company has sued EPA on three different fronts, arguing that the agency violated the Clean Water Act, colluded with outside groups to reach its determination and violated the Freedom of Information Act. The suit concerning the outside groups, filed under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, was the one settled Thursday in federal court in Alaska.

Under the terms of the agreement, EPA will begin the process of withdrawing its proposed determination, which will be subject to public notice and comment. It will not take the next step in the process until 48 months from the settlement or until the Army Corps of Engineers issues its final environmental impact statement, whichever comes first.

Northern Dynasty Minerals, which has never filed federal permit applications for Pebble Mine, would have to do so within 30 months.

“From the outset of this unfortunate saga, we’ve asked for nothing more than fairness and due process under the law — the right to propose a development plan for Pebble and have it assessed against the robust environmental regulations and rigorous permitting requirements enforced in Alaska and the United States,” the company’s chief executive, Ron Thiessen, said in a statement early Friday. “Today’s settlement gives us precisely that, the same treatment every developer and investor in a stable, first world country should expect.”

The firm’s stock price has already been bolstered by Trump’s election victory. After falling to as low as 25 cents a share at one point last year, the price soared after the November election, jumping 25 percent overnight and reaching as high as $3.18 earlier this year. The company has touted the likely benefits of having a new, friendlier administration in office. A series of investor presentations by Thiessen included a PowerPoint slide titled “Trump Election Victory — A Return to Normal.”

While many congressional Republicans, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and House Science  Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) oppose what they’ve described as EPA’s “preemptive” veto of the project, public opinion in Alaska on the mining proposal remains split.

Last fall a ballot measure passed with more than 65 percent that would require the state legislature to pass a measure approving any large-scale mine in the Bristol Bay region, and they would have to determine that such an operation would not imperil the area’s sockeye salmon fishery.

Alaska Gov. Bill Walker, an independent, has said that constructing Pebble Mine “presents formidable challenges” given the valuable fishery and the rural village life that depends on it.

“Based on the information available to me now, I do not support the Pebble Mine,” reads a statement from his 2014 campaign site.

Taryn Kiekow Heimer, a senior policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in an interview that “the opposition in Alaska has grown stronger” since EPA blocked the mine’s construction.

But in Washington, the political climate has shifted.

Administration officials are reopening the question of whether to construct Pebble Mine, and may even reconsider the Interior and Agriculture Departments’ move in December denying another company’s request to renew a lease on the southwest border of Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.

In one of the last big mining decisions of the Obama era, the two departments rejected Twin Metals Minnesota’s lease renewal bid, and set in motion a formal review to examine whether all mining activities in 234,000 acres abutting the wilderness should be barred for the next 20 years. Twin Metals Minnesota is a subsidiary of Antofagasta Mining PLC.

Minnesota Reps. Rick Nolan (D) and Tom Emmer (R) met with Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke on April 26 to discuss whether to reverse that decision, according to individuals who asked for anonymity to discuss a private conversation. Bob McFarlin, Twin Metals Minnesota’s government affairs adviser, said in an email that the firm has met with lawmakers and top federal officials “in both the previous and current administrations to express our concerns” about the decision to deny the company’s lease application.

“I am optimistic that we will be able to work with the new administration to allow this initiative to move forward,” Nolan said in a statement Thursday. “Having met with all the involved agencies and parties, I know renewing these leases is the sensible and correct thing to do.”

And Hal Quinn, president and CEO of the National Mining Association, said in a statement that his industry stands to “benefit most from the administration’s willingness to lift the regulatory burden that has impaired our ability to compete in the energy market.”

That will ease restrictions on “access and development of much needed domestic minerals and metals,” Quinn added, which “are needed  for everything from infrastructure and manufacturing to cutting edge technologies.”

The really big Trump scandal (almost) everyone is missing

<snip> from:   http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/The-really-big-Trump-scandal-almost-everyone-is-missing-.html

…Consider these developments in the last few days:

The Trump administration is working on a budget that would gut environmental enforcement in this country — slashing $2 billion and 3,000 jobs at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. For example, an EPA program that seeks to reduce algae blooms and pollution that threatens the Great Lakes — yes, the same region where voters gave Trump his Electoral College victory — would be reduced from $300 million to just $10 million.

— Team Trump also wants to cut a whopping $500 million or so from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) program that sends satellites aloft to monitor extreme weather and the effects of climate change. The former head of the agency told the Washington Post, “Cutting NOAA’s satellite budget will compromise NOAA’s mission of keeping Americans safe from extreme weather and providing forecasts that allow businesses and citizens to make smart plans.” But given the president’s hostility to global warming science, that was probably the idea.

— In the same vein, Big Auto asked the Trump administration for help in rolling back tough rules on curbing tailpipe emissions and converting to electric cars that would have reduced America’s greenhouse gas emissions by about one-third. The Trump administration asked industry, in so many words, how fast would you like us to get that out to you?

— Those rules won’t get as much attention as Trump’s looming order on a new travel ban — ignoring findings from his own Homeland Security Department that visitors from the affected countries aren’t committing terrorist acts — or his immigration crackdown. While Immigration Control and Enforcement (ICE) continues to operate on steroids in major American cities, the administration is weighing a new policy that would separate migrant children from their mothers at border crossings. “That type of thing is where we depart from border security and get into violating human rights,” U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Texas Democrat, said.

That type of thing also used to be major news — but not in a time when we are so easily distracted by President Trump’s roving thumbs. But the reality is that — for all the media coverage of a White House implosion — the Trump administration really is “a fine-tuned machine” when it comes to serving its corporate benefactors and gutting any pretense of regulatory oversight. I did, however, add the word “(almost)” to the headline of this piece because the New York Times is out tonight with a really good overview of all the favors that the new president’s crew has performed for Big Business, even as they poison the air and the water that Trump’s blue-collar voters ingest.

The newspaper chronicled more than 90 rules affecting the public’s health or safety or protecting consumers that have been rolled back, eliminated or gutted in just the first six weeks of the Trump administration. It’s a startling change — one that the Times called the “leading edge” of top Trump adviser Steve Bannon’s scheme for “the destruction of the administrative state.”

I guess you could say that screwing over the little guy to benefit billionaire campaign donors and corporations isn’t exactly brand new — but it’s never been done this fast, this blatantly, and with this little compassion. I don’t know if Trump’s policies are “High Crimes and Misdemeanors,” but I do consider them a crime against human decency. And even if Trump were to be miraculously impeached over Russia or gets 25th Amendment-ed to a farm upstate, do you think that a President Mike Pence would care a flying fig about the purity of your tap water?

Sometimes I think about the launch of the Trump administration in terms of Ronald Reagan and his famous 1984 re-election ad, “Morning in America.” But morning in Donald Trump’s America is a place where the Houston sunrise struggles to break through the smog, where coal plants are up early dumping toxic goo into your streams, and Latin American families hide behind closed curtains, fearing a knock on their door. And the worst part is that the sun isn’t even over the treetops yet.

The Five Most Pro-Animal House Democrats


Fighting the good fight.

Don beyer commerce secretary penny pritzker kxnosdhfv4ul.jpg?ixlib=rails 2.1

The animal movement, for too long, has relied on individual tactics. Many activists spend their time encouraging individuals to adopt a vegan diet. A much smaller number carry out acts of terror against animal exploiters. Far from being diametrically opposed, these groups often share an understandable—but self-defeating—pessimism about collective, political engagement. The truth is we can’t afford to leave the electoral arena to animal abusers. Below are the five most animal-friendly Democrats in the House of Representatives, who we should support and push to do better.

Using the Humane Society Legislative Fund’s 2016 scorecard, there was initially a 37-way tie for most pro-animal House Democrat, which is actually synonymous with most pro-animal representative. All of these politicians received 100-percent ratings from HSLF, while earning extra credit for leadership on animal protection issues. To break this tie, I examined scores going back to 2012. I gave newer representatives the benefit of the doubt, ranking those with shorter, but equally pro-animal records as more compassionate.

Readers may be surprised to see that Oregon Rep. Earl Blumenauer, co-chair of the Congressional Animal Protection Caucus, is not on this list. This probably reflects a flaw in my methodology—and perhaps also that of HSLF. Since Blumenauer has served in the House since 1996, he was hobbled against newer representatives with my approach. Further, Blumenauer voted against final passage of the Agricultural Act of 2014. As the Humane Scorecard from that year notes, “Representatives had many reasons for voting as they did on this large package.”

5. Dina Titus—The representative from Nevada voted for the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, which would reduce and eventually replace animal use in chemical testing. Titus also supported the inclusion of animal-cruelty crimes in the National Incident Based Reporting System, saying, “The FBI’s ability to collect data on these crimes not only enhances law enforcement’s ability to monitor and analyze trends, but will also provide evidence-based resources to study the known connection between animal-cruelty crimes and other types of violent crime. This is a significant step forward for animal welfare, our law enforcement agencies, and our communities at large.”

4. Grace Meng—This New York congresswoman voted against the Sportsmen’s Heritage and Recreational Enhancement (SHARE) Act, which pandered to big-game hunters and other anti-animal groups. In a letter to then-Agricultural Secretary Tom Vilsack, expressing her concern about the treatment of disabled calves, Meng wrote, “As long as downed animals are allowed to be slaughtered for food, companies will have an incentive to pressure workers to engage in rough handling to try to get those animals up and walking so they can pass inspection. Conversely, once companies are no longer allowed to include downer calves in the food supply, they will have an incentive to treat these animals more humanely.”

3. Susan Davis—The Californian signed a group letter to the Agricultural Appropriations Subcommittee, seeking increased funding for enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act, the Horse Protection Act, the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, and a federal animal fighting law, as well as other pro-animal programs. Announcing her flawless rating from HSLF, Davis said, “How we treat animals reflects on how we treat each other. I appreciate the work the Humane Society does on behalf of animals in the wild and in the home. I enjoy working with them on these critical issues and am proud of my perfect score on their report.”

2. Katherine Clark—The congresswoman from Massachusetts was one of two sponsors of the Pet and Women Safety (PAWS) Act, which would protect human and nonhuman victims of domestic violence. Speaking in favor of the bill, Clark said, “Sadly, domestic violence is something one in every four women will experience at some point in their lives. This isolating experience is made even worse for those who fear for the safety of their pet. Most pet lovers, including me, consider their beloved dog or cat a part of their family. No one should have to make the choice between leaving an abusive situation and ensuring their pet’s safety.”

1. Don Beyer—Beyer, from Virginia, was one of four sponsors of the Humane Cosmetics Act, which would phase out cosmetic tests on live animals and the sale of animal-tested cosmetics. Defending the legislation, Beyer said, “It is time for us to end the painful and completely unnecessary process of testing American cosmetics on animals. Safer, more cost-effective, and completely humane alternatives already exist; and the United States is in no danger of losing its competitive role as a leader in the global cosmetics industry. Now, we need to ensure our place as a moral leader.”