Sharks Use Earth’s Magnetic Fields to Guide Them Like a Map – “It Really Is Mind Blowing”

TOPICS:Cell PressMarine BiologySharks

By CELL PRESS MAY 7, 2021

Bonnethead Shark Hunting at Night

Sea turtles are known for relying on magnetic signatures to find their way across thousands of miles to the very beaches where they hatched. Now, researchers reporting in the journal Current Biology on May 6, 2021, have some of the first solid evidence that sharks also rely on magnetic fields for their long-distance forays across the sea.

“It had been unresolved how sharks managed to successfully navigate during migration to targeted locations,” said Save Our Seas Foundation project leader Bryan Keller, also of Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory. “This research supports the theory that they use the earth’s magnetic field to help them find their way; it’s nature’s GPS.”

Researchers had known that some species of sharks travel over long distances to reach very specific locations year after year. They also knew that sharks are sensitive to electromagnetic fields. As a result, scientists had long speculated that sharks were using magnetic fields to navigate. But the challenge was finding a way to test this in sharks.

“To be honest, I am surprised it worked,” Keller said. “The reason this question has been withstanding for 50 years is because sharks are difficult to study.”

This image shows an overhead shot of bonnetheads in the holding tank. Credit: Bryan Keller

Keller realized the needed studies would be easier to do in smaller sharks. They also needed a species known for returning each year to specific locations. He and his colleagues settled on bonnetheads (Sphyrna tiburo).

“The bonnethead returns to the same estuaries each year,” Keller said. “This demonstrates that the sharks knows where ‘home’ is and can navigate back to it from a distant location.”

The question then was whether bonnetheads managed those return trips by relying on a magnetic map. To find out, the researchers used magnetic displacement experiments to test 20 juvenile, wild-caught bonnetheads. In their studies, they exposed sharks to magnetic conditions representing locations hundreds of kilometers away from where the sharks were actually caught. Such studies allow for straightforward predictions about how the sharks should subsequently orient themselves if they were indeed relying on magnetic cues.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/FI8p3ZR914A?feature=oembed
This video is footage from an experimental trial, where the bonnethead’s swimming behavior is affected by the magnetic field it is experiencing. Credit: Bryan Keller

If sharks derive positional information from the geomagnetic field, the researchers predicted northward orientation in the southern magnetic field and southward orientation in the northern magnetic field, as the sharks attempted to compensate for their perceived displacement. They predicted no orientation preference when sharks were exposed to the magnetic field that matched their capture site. And, it turned out, the sharks acted as they’d predicted when exposed to fields within their natural range.

The researchers suggest that this ability to navigate based on magnetic fields may also contribute to the population structure of sharks. The findings in bonnetheads also likely help to explain impressive feats by other shark species. For instance, one great white shark was documented to migrate between South Africa and Australia, returning to the same exact location the following year.

This figure shows how the experiment assessed the ability of bonnethead sharks to use the Earth’s magnetic field to navigate. Credit: Keller et al./Current Biology

“How cool is it that a shark can swim 20,000 kilometers round trip in a three-dimensional ocean and get back to the same site?” Keller asked. “It really is mind blowing. In a world where people use GPS to navigate almost everywhere, this ability is truly remarkable.”

In future studies, Keller says he’d like to explore the effects of magnetic fields from anthropogenic sources such as submarine cables on sharks. They’d also like to study whether and how sharks rely of magnetic cues not just during long-distance migration but also during their everyday behavior.

Reference: “Map-like use of Earth’s magnetic field in sharks” by Bryan A. Keller, Nathan F. Putman, R. Dean Grubbs, David S. Portnoy and Timothy P. Murphy, 6 May 2021, Current Biology.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.103

This work was supported by the Save Our Seas Foundation and the Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory.

TOPICS:Cell PressMarine BiologySharks

By CELL PRESS MAY 7, 2021

Bonnethead Shark Hunting at Night

Sea turtles are known for relying on magnetic signatures to find their way across thousands of miles to the very beaches where they hatched. Now, researchers reporting in the journal Current Biology on May 6, 2021, have some of the first solid evidence that sharks also rely on magnetic fields for their long-distance forays across the sea.

“It had been unresolved how sharks managed to successfully navigate during migration to targeted locations,” said Save Our Seas Foundation project leader Bryan Keller, also of Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory. “This research supports the theory that they use the earth’s magnetic field to help them find their way; it’s nature’s GPS.”

Researchers had known that some species of sharks travel over long distances to reach very specific locations year after year. They also knew that sharks are sensitive to electromagnetic fields. As a result, scientists had long speculated that sharks were using magnetic fields to navigate. But the challenge was finding a way to test this in sharks.

“To be honest, I am surprised it worked,” Keller said. “The reason this question has been withstanding for 50 years is because sharks are difficult to study.”

This image shows an overhead shot of bonnetheads in the holding tank. Credit: Bryan Keller

Keller realized the needed studies would be easier to do in smaller sharks. They also needed a species known for returning each year to specific locations. He and his colleagues settled on bonnetheads (Sphyrna tiburo).

“The bonnethead returns to the same estuaries each year,” Keller said. “This demonstrates that the sharks knows where ‘home’ is and can navigate back to it from a distant location.”

The question then was whether bonnetheads managed those return trips by relying on a magnetic map. To find out, the researchers used magnetic displacement experiments to test 20 juvenile, wild-caught bonnetheads. In their studies, they exposed sharks to magnetic conditions representing locations hundreds of kilometers away from where the sharks were actually caught. Such studies allow for straightforward predictions about how the sharks should subsequently orient themselves if they were indeed relying on magnetic cues.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/FI8p3ZR914A?feature=oembed
This video is footage from an experimental trial, where the bonnethead’s swimming behavior is affected by the magnetic field it is experiencing. Credit: Bryan Keller

If sharks derive positional information from the geomagnetic field, the researchers predicted northward orientation in the southern magnetic field and southward orientation in the northern magnetic field, as the sharks attempted to compensate for their perceived displacement. They predicted no orientation preference when sharks were exposed to the magnetic field that matched their capture site. And, it turned out, the sharks acted as they’d predicted when exposed to fields within their natural range.

The researchers suggest that this ability to navigate based on magnetic fields may also contribute to the population structure of sharks. The findings in bonnetheads also likely help to explain impressive feats by other shark species. For instance, one great white shark was documented to migrate between South Africa and Australia, returning to the same exact location the following year.

This figure shows how the experiment assessed the ability of bonnethead sharks to use the Earth’s magnetic field to navigate. Credit: Keller et al./Current Biology

“How cool is it that a shark can swim 20,000 kilometers round trip in a three-dimensional ocean and get back to the same site?” Keller asked. “It really is mind blowing. In a world where people use GPS to navigate almost everywhere, this ability is truly remarkable.”

In future studies, Keller says he’d like to explore the effects of magnetic fields from anthropogenic sources such as submarine cables on sharks. They’d also like to study whether and how sharks rely of magnetic cues not just during long-distance migration but also during their everyday behavior.

Reference: “Map-like use of Earth’s magnetic field in sharks” by Bryan A. Keller, Nathan F. Putman, R. Dean Grubbs, David S. Portnoy and Timothy P. Murphy, 6 May 2021, Current Biology.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.103

This work was supported by the Save Our Seas Foundation and the Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory.

Scientists Discover 400-Year-Old Greenland Shark Likely Born Around 1620

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-3673330609533067&output=html&h=280&slotname=6515906203&adk=1663315129&adf=3810258443&pi=t.ma~as.6515906203&w=640&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1615576048&rafmt=1&psa=1&format=640×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fearthlymission.com%2F400-year-old-greenland-shark-science-discovery%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR2rvxsqpxkvhLHZP36hfUzyXLq8b1Nlfl8NffI8waOea1x6yOvYToTnPls&flash=0&fwr=0&fwrattr=true&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTAuMCIsIng4NiIsIiIsIjg5LjAuNDM4OS44MiIsW11d&tt_state=W3siaXNzdWVyT3JpZ2luIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9hZHNlcnZpY2UuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbSIsInN0YXRlIjo2fSx7Imlzc3Vlck9yaWdpbiI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXR0ZXN0YXRpb24uYW5kcm9pZC5jb20iLCJzdGF0ZSI6N31d&dt=1615576047812&bpp=137&bdt=10365&idt=1081&shv=r20210309&cbv=r20190131&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D10b32d6ac4609b4c-22a5e1bedbc60051%3AT%3D1615572585%3ART%3D1615572585%3AS%3DALNI_MaE4ItI-xUOxNNOE_OCKXKWsTdRDw&correlator=3759806083945&frm=20&pv=2&ga_vid=154012911.1615572585&ga_sid=1615576049&ga_hid=1710642561&ga_fc=0&u_tz=-480&u_his=1&u_java=0&u_h=640&u_w=1139&u_ah=607&u_aw=1139&u_cd=24&u_nplug=3&u_nmime=4&adx=71&ady=287&biw=1123&bih=538&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=44736524%2C21066433%2C21068083%2C31060428%2C21067496&oid=3&pvsid=4298001153230754&pem=130&rx=0&eae=0&fc=896&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1139%2C0%2C1139%2C607%2C1139%2C537&vis=2&rsz=%7C%7CoeEr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=8320&bc=31&ifi=1&uci=a!1&fsb=1&xpc=lLeOWbEbts&p=https%3A//earthlymission.com&dtd=1190

Greenland sharks are now the longest-living vertebrates known on Earth, according to scientists.

Image credit: Dive Magazine

Researchers used radiocarbon dating of eye proteins to determine the ages of 28 Greenland sharks, and estimated that one female was about 400 years old. The former vertebrate record-holder was a bowhead whale estimated to be 211 years old.

As lead author Julius Nielsen, a marine biologist from the University of Copenhagen, put it: “We had our expectations that we were dealing with an unusual animal, but I think everyone doing this research was very surprised to learn the sharks were as old as they were.”

Greenland sharks swim through the cold waters of the Arctic and the North Atlantic at such a sluggish pace that has earned them the nickname “sleeper sharks.” Image credit: Julius Nielsen

Greenland sharks are huge and can grow up to 5m in length. Yet, they grow at just 1cm a year. They can be found, swimming slowly, throughout the cold, deep waters of the North Atlantic.

The team believes the animals only reach sexual maturity when they are 4m-long. And with this new, very lengthy age-range, it suggests this does not occur until the animals are about 150 years old.

A newly tagged Greenland shark returns to the deep and cold waters of the Uummannaq Fjord in western Greenland. Image credit: Julius Nielsen

The research was made possible, in part, by the atmospheric thermonuclear weapons tests conducted during the 1960s, which released massive amounts of radiocarbon that were then absorbed by organisms in ocean ecosystems. Sharks that showed evidence of elevated radiocarbon in the nucleus of their eye tissue were therefore born after the so-called “bomb pulse,” and were younger than 50 years old, while sharks with lower radiocarbon levels were born prior to that, and were at least 50 years old or older, the study authors wrote.

The scientists then calculated an age range for the older sharks based on their size, and on prior data about Greenland sharks’ size at birth and growth rates in fish.

A Greenland shark near the ocean surface after its release from research vessel Sanna in northern Greenland. Image credit: Julius Nielsen

According to the results of the analysis – which has a probability rate of about 95 percent – the sharks were at least 272 years old, and could be as much as 512 years old (!) with 390 years as the most likely average life span, according to Nielsen.about:blank

But why do Greenland sharks live so long?

Their longevity is actually attributed to their very slow metabolism and the cold waters that they inhabit. They swim through the cold waters of the Arctic and the North Atlantic at such a sluggish pace that has earned them the nickname “sleeper sharks.” Seal parts have been found in their bellies, but the sharks move so slowly that experts have suggested that the seals must have been asleep or already dead when the sharks ate them.

The slower you go, the farther you will be.

Sharks Are Becoming Functionally Extinct Around The World

Jul 28, 2020,12:40am EDT

Melissa Cristina MárquezContributorScienceI write about the latest, exciting research on sharks worldwide!

https://www.forbes.com/sites/melissacristinamarquez/2020/07/28/sharks-are-becoming-functionally-extinct-around-the-world/?fbclid=IwAR01AdXBjdLb9d_fzQw3uCHqF50zNbkZo-_F_TpLfQK_ml-oIpkcjkzadp0#372d1a556019

Since the dinosaurs have roamed our planet, there have been sharks. These predators, swimming beneath our ocean’s waves, have survived numerous mass extinctions over the course of our planet’s history, and seem to have evolved to survive anything… except their most formidable opponent yet: us. For most people, an ocean full of sharks is their worst nightmare. But for those who study these animals, the reality of dwindling shark numbers is theirs.

Reef shark near a BRUV
Since the dinosaurs have roamed our planet, there have been sharks. These predators, swimming … [+] PERMISSION GRANTED BY GLOBAL FINPRINT

Sharks face a staggering number of threats such as overfishing and bycatch, habitat destruction and degradation, climate change, plastic pollution, and illegal shark finning. In one of the largest collaborative projects yet, the impact these threats have had on our global shark populations has been made glaringly obvious: nearly 20% of the world’s sharks have vanished from reefs thought to be teaming with life.

Coral reefs were once renowned for being abundant with sharks, but these animals have been targeted by both legal and illegal fishers so that today many reefs see few, if any, individuals. By taking sharks out of these highly complex ecosystems, it has triggered a phenomenon called “mesopredator release,” where other large predatory fish will increase in abundance and feed on herbivores. If you’re a fisher, having more of these large fish (that you generally fish for) sounds like an awesome trade! But herbivorous fish are a vital component of this habitat, eating algae that would otherwise overwhelm and potentially kill young corals.ADVERTISINGRecommended For You

The study, published in the journal Nature, includes over 100 scientists working together to go through 15,000 hours of underwater video from 371 reefs in 58 countries, states and territories to show that sharksare absent on many of our coral reefs. In fact, this new research from Global FinPrint shows they are functionally extinct — which means they are so rare in certain areas they can no longer fulfill their role in the ecosystem. Since 2015, the Global FinPrint team — which is led by researchers at Florida International University (FIU) — has used underwater cameras to pinpoint specific strongholds for sharks and rays. 

Shark on a reef

Costa Rica’s Ministry of Environment Joins Efforts with Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

 

As part of a campaign to protect the Cocos Island UNESCO World Heritage Site, Sea Shepherd Conservation Society partnered with Costa Rica’s Ministry of Environment to collect and transport 34 tons of marine pollution, illegal shark finning long lines, and other confiscated fishing gear, which had been accumulating on the remote volcanic island of Cocos for over 25 years.

For a one-time project, Sea Shepherd Conservation Society removed over 1700 miles (2800 kilometers) of nylon monofilament fishing line from Cocos Island and shipped it to Aquafil to be transformed into ECONYL® regenerated nylon, which is used for carpet flooring and fashion items.

Island Del Coco National Park is home to many marine ecosystems that provide universal importance. The Costa Rican thermal dome off the coast of the Cocos Island gives 7% of biodiversity to the world. Thanks to this one-time collaboration, harmful marine debris was recovered from the ocean and is set to be transformed into a high performing material that can have a second life in new products.

“It is not just about sending a boat to the island and bring the trash to the mainland, it is to do the whole work,” stated Costa Rica’s Minister of the Environment Carlos Manuel Rodriguez, concluding “this is an achievement we are very proud of, and above all, we are very grateful for the support we received.”

“Plastics are a serious threat to marine ecosystems. Removing illegal nylon fishing gear from such a pristine environment, repurposing the material and ensuring it will not be used to kill sharks again is a big step in protecting sharks and the Tropical Eastern Pacific marine environment, which Cocos Island is part of,” said Captain Paul Watson. Adding, “This is a very important migration route for sharks and Sea Shepherd’s commitment to protect sharks and their habitats is a holistic one, tackling Illegal targeting of sharks by longline and overseeing the proper disposal of the fishing gear, by ensuring a chain of custody from the high seas to the recycling facility.”

ECONYL® nylon is obtained through the regeneration process of nylon waste and reduces the global warming impact of nylon by up to 80 percent compared with material generated from oil. Aquafil, the Italian company that invented ECONYL®, brings new purpose to waste materials that would otherwise pollute the world’s landfills and oceans.

Source: Sea Shepherd Conservation Society


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Last convicted shark-dragger Benac will get fishing license back in 2022

Last convicted shark-dragger Benac will get fishing license back in 2022

(Beth Clifton collage)

If,  that is,  he does 250 hours of community service & finds an animal shelter that will take him for 125 hours

            TAMPA,  Florida––Holding out for a lighter sentence under a plea bargain offer did not wholly pay off on September 12,  2019 for Robert Lee “Bo” Benac III,  30.

But Benac did avoid a felony cruelty conviction and will get his fishing license back two years sooner than shark-dragging  buddy Michael Wenzel,  even if he will have to perform more than twice as much volunteer community service work meanwhile.

Benac was the last of three Florida men to settle charges originally filed as felony cruelty,  after they shot and dragged a blacktip shark to death behind a speedboat on June 26,  2017 near Egmont Key in Hillsborough County waters.

Mark Wenzel (left) & Bo Benac (right)
(Facebook photo)

Benac pleaded guilty to two misdemeanors

Benac,  of Bradenton,  Florida,  pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of aggravated cruelty to animals and violating Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission fishing rules.

Benac was sentenced to serve 10 days in the Hillsborough County jail ,  the time to be served on weekends,  plus 11 months on probation.  Benac is also to pay a $2,500 fine and perform 250 hours of community service,  half of those hours at an animal shelter.
Benac in addition lost his fishing license for three years.

Benac in March 2019 reportedly refused the same plea deal that fellow shark-dragger Wenzel,  22,  accepted.  Wenzel,  who was videotaped exulting as the men dragged the dying shark, accepted the same jail and probation time,  and the same fine of $2,500,  but was required to perform only 100 hours of community service,  and had his fishing privileges suspended for five years.

Clockwise from top: Michael Wenzel,  Bo Benac,  Spencer Heintz, & Nick Easterling.

Wenzel pleaded to one felony

Wenzel pleaded guilty,  reported Joe Hendricks of the Anna Maria Sun,  “to a third-degree felony count of aggravated cruelty to animals.  A second and similar third-degree animal cruelty charge was dismissed.”

Wenzel,  like Benac,  also pleaded guilty to violating Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission rules,  Hendricks wrote.

“The misdemeanor charge pertained to the illegal taking of a shark,”  Hendricks explained.  “Video shows Wenzel using a .38 caliber revolver to shoot the shark.  State law prohibits taking a shark by any other means than with a hook and line.”

From left, Michael Wenzel, Bo Benac, and the blacktip shark they dragged.

Charges dropped against third defendant

A third Florida man involved in the shark dragging incident,  Spencer Heintz,  23,  escaped prosecution when Florida assistant state attorney Andrew Hubbard on May 1,  2018 told the court that the state had dropped all charges against him due to a purported lack of evidence.

Heintz had faced two counts of aggravated cruelty to animals.

“Another Florida man on the boat that day,  24-year-old Nicholas Burns Easterling,  did not face charges,  because he provided information and cooperated with the investigation,” said Courthouse News.

The major evidence against the defendants was a widely distributed video that Wenzel posted to social media on July 24,  2017

.

Sharks and rays to be given new international protections

Guitarfish are one of the newly protected speciesImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionGuitarfish are one of the newly protected species

Countries have agreed to strengthen protections for 18 threatened species of sharks and rays, including those hunted for their meat and fins.

The proposal was passed at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) on Sunday.

The newly protected species include mako sharks, wedgefishes and guitarfishes.

A demand for shark fin soup is one of the driving factors in the depleting numbers of sharks in the ocean.

The proposal, which was tabled by Mexico and requires ratification this week, means that the species can no longer be traded unless it can be proven that their fishing will not impact the possibility of their survival.

The number of sharks killed each year in commercial fisheries is estimated at 100 million, with a range between 63 million and 273 million, according to The Pew Trust.

Makos, the fastest shark species, have almost disappeared completely from the Mediterranean and numbers are diminishing rapidly in the Atlantic, Northern Pacific and Indian oceans.

Although 102 countries voted in favour of the move, 40 – including China, Iceland, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand – opposed it.

Some argued that there was not enough evidence to show that mako sharks were disappearing as a result of fishing.

Presentational white space

Sharks and rays: The facts on the “rhinos of the seas”

  • A group of 16 very unusual animals called wedgefish and guitarfish, together known as rhino rays
  • They are assessed as the most threatened family of marine fish – all bar one is critically endangered
  • Two of the wedgefish species may already have been driven to extinction by commercial fisheries
  • Wedgefish have two large dorsal fins and a large tail lobe, prized for use in soup.
Presentational white space

Ali Hood, director of conservation at Shark Trust, welcomed the move.

“Mako are highly valued for their meat and fins. Decades of unrestricted overfishing, particularly on the high seas, has led to significant population declines,” Ms Hood told the BBC.

The “listing would be critical for ensuring that international trade is held to sustainable levels, prompting urgently needed catch limits and improving traceability”, she added.

Media captionGreat white sharks filmed hunting in kelp forests for the first time

Taiwan nabs truck-load of illegal shark meat

Fisheries Agency seizes over 30 tons of illicit shark meat in southern Taiwan

Over 30 tons of contraband shark meat. (Image courtesy of Fisheries Agency)

Over 30 tons of contraband shark meat. (Image courtesy of Fisheries Agency)

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) – Taiwan authorities seized over 30 tones of illegal shark meat at Kaohsiung Xiagang Fishing Harbor (高雄小港漁港) on Sept. 5, the Fisheries Agency (漁業署) said in a statement yesterday.

The seizure is the biggest haul since revised offshore fishing rules entered into force in 2006, according to the Fisheries Agency.

Fishing of silky shark is banned by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, which led Taiwan to do the same.

30 tons of silky shark (carcharhinus falciformis) meat was seized during an inspection of a small fishing boat named “Jin-chang 6” (金昌6號). The boat came under suspicion after authorities noted the vessel made unscheduled stops in two other fishing ports.

The suspicious catch was confirmed to be that of the banned silky shark days later, after a positive DNA test, which led the contents of the boat to be seized on Sept. 13.

The Fishery Agency said that according to relevant regulation, the boat operators face of a fine of between NT$2-10 million (US$65,000-325,000), and potential revocation of fishing licenses.

The Fisheries Agency urges the public to not catch illegal aquatic animals, adding it has set up a 24-hour monitoring center to tackle illegal fishing.

Although some forms of shark are legal to eat in Taiwan, the practice has gained increasing opposition from environmental groups. According to a recent survey by the WildAid and Life Conservationist Association found 76 percent of Taiwanese people surveyed had eaten shark fin soup in the past three years, but only 32 percent within the last year.

Shark charities flooded with donations after Trump says he hopes sharks die

 https://www.marketwatch.com/story/shark-charities-flooded-with-donations-after-trump-says-he-hopes-sharks-die-2018-01-23

Published: Jan 25, 2018 10:25 a.m. ET

Raising money to protect the feared sea creatures can be a challenge

Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection
Charities that help sharks have seen an uptick in donations since the publication of President Donald Trump’s anti-shark comments.

By

LESLIEALBRECHT

PERSONAL FINANCE REPORTER

President Donald Trump’s reported death wish for sharks has been a lifeline for charities that protect them.

Shark-related nonprofits have been receiving a steady stream of donations in the wake of Trump reportedly telling adult film actress Stormy Daniels, “I donate to all these charities and I would never donate to any charity that helps sharks. I hope all the sharks die.” Trump’s comments came to light in an In Touch Weekly interviewwith Daniels, who reportedly had a fling with Trump in 2006. Daniels said Trump was “obsessed” with sharks and “terrified” of them.

Since Trump’s strong anti-shark stance became public late last week, donations have poured in at the nonprofits Atlantic White Shark Conservancy and Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, their leaders told MarketWatch.

“It’s actually more dangerous to play golf than it is to go swimming in the ocean with sharks.”

— Paul Watson, founder of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

“We have been receiving donations in Trump’s name since the story was published,” said Cynthia Wilgren, chief executive officer and co-founder of Atlantic White Shark Conservancy, based in Chatham, Mass. Most of the money has come from first-time donors, she added. “It can certainly be a challenge to raise money for a species that most people fear,” Wilgren said.

Captain Paul Watson, founder of the Burbank, Calif. based Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, said his group had received “quite a few” donations from benefactors who specifically mentioned Trump’s comments.

How machine learning is teaching drones to see for themselves

He and his fellow conservationists consider Trump’s comments “ignorant,” Watson said, but they’ve had a positive effect. “Anything that focuses attention on the plight of sharks worldwide is valuable, so I guess in that way the president did good service,” Watson said.

His group sends boats across the world to catch poachers who illegally kill sea animals. Some 75 million sharks a year are killed, often when their fins are cut off and they are tossed back into the ocean, Watson said. When their fins are removed, sharks are unable to swim effectively, so they sink down to the bottom and die or get eaten by other predators. Sharks are also killed to make shark leather shoes and belts, and for shark liver oil, which is used as a dietary supplement and in beauty products such as lipstick, according to Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.

The popular image of sharks as super predators is unfair, Watson said. While hundreds of millions of people swim in oceans every year, sharks kill only about five people a year around the world, Watson said. “It’s actually more dangerous to play golf than it is to go swimming in the ocean with sharks,” Watson said. “Quite a few more die from lightning strikes and bee stings while playing golf than from sharks.”

Don’t miss: Trump may hate sharks, but these animals cause more deaths each year

Sharks are a critical part of ocean ecosystems and their fate is closely tied to the health of oceans as a whole. If they go extinct, humans wouldn’t be too far behind, Watson claimed.

The president’s hatred of sharks pre-dates his time in office, according to his Twitter history. Back in 2013 he said he’s not a fan of the animals. In November 2017, Trump drew the ire of conservationists after eating shark fin soup during a visit to Vietnam.

Shark charities and other nonprofits face an uncertain future under Trump’s new tax law. Some estimate that charities could see a $13 to $20 billion drop in donations because of changes in the tax code.

Toronto filmmaker Rob Stewart was an aquatic guardian angel for the “demons” of the deep

 

by PAUL WATSON
Special to The Globe and Mail
Published Saturday, Feb. 04, 2017 6:17PM EST
Last updated Saturday, Feb. 04, 2017 6:44PM EST

At the age of 22, Robert Stewart was a young and energetic man who understood that the most powerful weapon in the world is the camera, and armed with a camera he set out in the year 2002 to change the world.

He succeeded.

With his award winning film Sharkwater he actually did change the world. He transformed fearsome monsters into beautifully awesome creatures, deserving of both respect and empathy.

Rob was a man passionate about sharks. He saw them as beautiful sentient beings whose existence contributes to a healthy oceanic eco-system. He set out to prove that his intuitive perception about the true nature of sharks was real, and he did just that.

When Rob boarded my Canadian flagged ship the Ocean Warrior we explored the once shark-abundant waters around Costa Rica’s Cocos Island and the enchanted islands of the Galapagos.

Despite the obstacles, together we found the sharks and together we found trouble with frequent confrontations with shark-finning poachers. Together we were arrested for our interventions for filming crimes in a nation where such crimes are ignored and even protected by the authorities and where a camera is considered as something subversive.

His images contrasted the beauty of sharks within their element against the ugly images of the horror of their living finless bodies tossed overboard, drifting helplessly to the bottom of the sea to die slowly, their shocked eyes open, allowing us, for a moment, to glimpse their pain as the spark of life was slowly extinguished.
Rob once told me that he understood that his work was dangerous but that the least of those dangers was being killed by a shark. He was literally a shark hugger and the image of him with his arms around a large shark, his hand affectionately stroking what most people considered a fearsome creature, was revolutionary and enlightening.

The man knew sharks. He understood their importance and his confidence with his views about sharks allowed him to approach and film some of the most amazing images ever captured about these spectacular apex predators.

In addition to being a marine biologist, Rob Stewart had the four most important virtues needed to be a world class expert on sharks and the reality of our relationship with the living diversity within oceanic eco-system.

These virtues are passion, empathy, courage and imagination. He had the courage to follow his passion with a remarkable empathy for his subject and the imagination to transform the focus of his work through the media of film in a way that changed the perception of sharks to tens of millions of people around the planet.

Rob died doing what he loved. He took chances. Three deep dives in one day using a rebreather was dangerous and he knew it was dangerous. These device,s even in the hands of a professional diver like Rob, are unpredictable. Some people have asked why he was using a rebreather. The answer is that it allowed him to stay down long and because it does not produce bubbles, allowing him to get closer to the sharks,, which are animals that are easily spooked by bubbles. It allowed him to be like one of his subjects rather than a suspicious invader from another world.

Speaking with Rob and looking into his eyes revealed a deep sadness at what our species has done to the sharks. We slaughter tens of millions of them every year to the point that many shark species hover on the brink of extinction and that is why the film he had been working on is called Sharkwater Extinction.

Rob was an incredible educator in the spirit of Captain Jacques Cousteau. He brought the aquatic realm onto land and confronted us with the reality of the true nature of sharks. That in itself was heroic, even more so than his extraordinary feats of underwater documentation. It was heroic because he was championing a creature that has for centuries inspired fear and loathing. As a filmmaker, he was the antithesis of Stephen Spielberg and Sharkwater was the Anti Jaws.

It was my privilege to stand with Rob to present Sharkwater at the Toronto Film Festival. It was my privilege to dive with him in the Galapagos and at Cocos Island.

Rob pioneered a new and intimate approach to documenting sharks and I believe he inspired other courageous film makers like Michael Muller (White Mike) and Madison Stewart (Shark Girl). He laid the groundwork for both film makers and conservationists.

Most importantly he has left a legacy.

He will be greatly missed, by his family and friends, by his fellow Canadians and by caring and dedicated people around the world who will never forget his work, his courage, his talent, his resolve, his imagination and his awesome passion for life, beauty and truth.
Paul Watson is a marine wildlife conservationist, environmental activist and founder of the the anti-poaching proup the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.

With his award winning film Sharkwater he actually did change the world. He transformed fearsome…
THEGLOBEANDMAIL.COM