Hunting clubs, rhino hunter sue Delta over trophy ban

Hunting clubs and a man who paid $350,000 for a license to hunt a black rhino in Namibia have sued Delta Airlines, saying its ban on transporting some big game hunting trophies hurts conservation efforts and violates its global obligations.

In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas on Thursday, the hunter of the endangered black rhino, Corey Knowlton, along with the Dallas Safari Club, the Houston Safari Clubs and others said that the transport of the trophies is allowed under a strict systems of global permits and Delta must abide by its obligations.

“Tourist hunting revenue is the backbone of anti-poaching in Africa. If there are fewer users, as Delta’s embargo envisions, there are fewer boots on the ground and reduced security for elephant, rhino and other at-risk wildlife,” the lawsuit said.

Delta officials were not immediately available for comment.

Delta was one of three U.S. airlines in August that banned the transport of lion, leopard, elephant, rhino or buffalo killed by trophy hunters, in the fallout from the killing of Zimbabwe’s Cecil the Lion about a month earlier.

Delta is the only of the carriers with direct service between Johannesburg and the United States and its decision was seen as carrying the most weight.

There has been an international outcry against trophy hunting among animal lovers since it emerged that American dentist Walter Palmer killed Cecil, a rare black-maned lion that was a familiar sight at Zimbabwe’s Hwange National Park.

Eleven African countries issue lion hunting permits. Of them South Africa’s hunting industry is the biggest, worth $675 million a year, according to the Professional Hunters Association.

Hunting groups argue the money generated from the legally sanctioned hunts bolster the coffers for conservation in emerging African countries that want to use their limited finances for social programs.

In the middle of this year, the cargo division of South Africa’s national carrier, SAA, lifted an embargo that had been in place since April on the transport of legally acquired hunting trophies of African lion and elephant, rhinoceros and tiger.

“It should be remembered that hundreds of legally acquired wildlife specimens, such as hunting trophies, pass through our main ports of entry and exit monthly without incident. Penalizing an entire industry for the illegal actions of the few is not in the country’s best interests,” South Africa’s Environment Minister Edna Molewa said at the time.

(Reporting by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Sandra Maler)


6 thoughts on “Hunting clubs, rhino hunter sue Delta over trophy ban

  1. Yes, that lawsuit needs to be turned against the hunters. This is no surprise, though. The hunters were quiet at first, maybe shocked at the outrage over Cecil’s death and the reaction against it. But they’re getting themselves together to fight back. They will always fight back, and that is how they keep winning. I wish the big animal rights groups could get themselves together, with our help, to keep trophy hunting in the news, maybe with well-placed billboards showing their ugly handiwork.

  2. I don’t know that the airlines are under any obligation to these groups. I thought they were blustering about someone at Air Canada who is one of their members? I wouldn’t be surprised if these groups bribedthe authorities about Palmer’s charges. Having ‘papers in order’ means zero. But that is the extent of their influence, not the airlines.

    • But once the laws change about ivory and animal parts, (if they haven’t already), it won’t matter, the airlines won’t be able to transport into the US anyway. Better get crackin’ and put the arm on your favorite politician, especially before a regime change in 2016!

  3. Couple points I’d like to spew:
    Knowlton spent a considerable fortune to murder a helpless old bull rhino. As far as I’m concern, no airline on the planet owes him a damn thing and should not be forced to comply simply because Corey is a spoiled, psychotic brat.
    If big game hunters were even remotely interested in anything other than achieving wood for blasting an animal out of existent, they would be spending portions of their considerable fortunes trying to stop poachers, wouldn’t they?
    Because what the poachers will likely achieve in short order is what big game hunters are trying to achieve over a slow burn – decimation of species. When these animals are gone, what’s next? No more Big 5 for the asshats with Big Money, and no more pseudo-medicines for the sick (running out of acceptable filthy names) peddling animal parts for erectile dysfunction.
    I hope I live long enough to see both parties’ careers ended much the same way as their victims. It ain’t a charitable thought, but it is what it is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s