Elk Hunting Group Wants to Expand Wolf-Killing Derby into Montana: $1,000 Bounty per Wolf


enviroNews Montana) — The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF), which has funded wolf-killing derbies in Idaho to the tune of $150,000 since 2013, is now seeking to expand its $1,000-per-kill bounty program to the neighboring state of Montana.

RMEF provides funds to the Foundation for Wildlife Management (F4WM), which says its mission “is to promote ungulate population recovery in areas negatively impacted by wolves.” While F4WM is based in Idaho, RMEF is stationed in Montana. F4WM held a meeting on April 5 in Sandpoint, Idaho, in an attempt to drum up support for the expanded bounty program. On April 6, Justin Webb, Mission Advancement Director for F4WM, wrote on the group’s Facebook page, “We had several folks from Montana expressing interest in F4WM expanding into Montana, and all were willing to help create Montana funding!”

Webb cautioned however, that it might take some time to determine if F4WM will go ahead with the effort. “[We] should be able to announce yay or nay on an F4WM expansion into Montana within a couple weeks. We have some business operational hurdles to work through, and fine tuning the legistics [sic] of the expansion.”

“These wolf lottery efforts are dismantling a century-long conservation heritage that is shared not just with environmental groups but with a lot of sportsmen groups as well,” said Erik Molvar, Executive Director for the Western Watersheds Project, in an exclusive interview with EnviroNews.

F4WM’s sole sponsor is RMEF. The group published an open letter to President Donald Trump on its website, calling the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone and Idaho “illegal” and telling the President that this “was one extreme criminal act of fraud and theft committed under the administration of William Jefferson Clinton that truly needs to be revisited.”

In 2012, Montana elk hunter Dave Stalling wrote in an op-ed for High Country News about what he described as the RMEF’s “all-out war against wolves.” Stalling worked previously for RMEF and saw changes that he linked to the hiring of David Allen as its director. Today, Allen is President and Chief Executive Officer at RMEF. Allen has supported the delisting of wolves as an endangered species in both Wyoming and Oregon.

“This is an organization that has always been at the fringes of the conservation movement,” said Molvar. “Basically, they are really anti-conservationists in disguise.”

In Idaho, the Department of Fish and Game (IDFG), which regulates hunting in the state, is beset with a funding scandal. An op-ed authored by local hunter Dave Cappell in the January 14, 2017 Idaho State Journal, alleges that two IDFG commissioners were told their terms would not be renewed so that new commissioners, who would approve a system of auction tags for game hunters, could be appointed.

IDFG relies on hunting fees for one-third of its budget. Faced with license fees that have not increased since 2005, the Department has looked at alternative strategies including salary savings.

The 2015 population of wolves in Idaho was documented as 786 animals. During the same year, humans were responsible for the death of 352 wolves, including legal hunting and trapping that took 256 animals. IDFG allows each hunter or trapper to take up to five wolves per year. Wolves may not be baited but electronic calls can be used.

In Montana, where hunting, fishing and other recreational activity fees account for more than two-thirds of the budget for the state’s Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks, 246 wolves were harvested in 2016. License fees have been increased recently, but are still not sufficient to cover expenses.

Wolf culls are seen as a way to increase the elk population, providing more game for hunters and more license fees for states. But Molvar holds a different view, telling EnviroNews, “There is no place in responsible wildlife management for this kind of killing for fun and money.”
But slaughtering wolves is not just limited to Idaho and Montana. This week, federal legislation signed into law by President Trump will allow the killing of wolves with pups in their dens on wildlife refuges in the state of Alaska, while in California, a lawsuit has been filed by the California Cattlemen’s Association and California Farm Bureau challenging the listing of gray wolves as endangered in the Golden State. Only a handful of specimens have been seen in California since OR-7, a lone wolf from Oregon, arrived in 2011. Prior to that, no wolves were known to be in the state since 1924.

RMEF is steadfast in its opposition to wolves. According to a position statement on its website:

“RMEF will continue to advocate for predator management and control efforts on the ground and in the courts. RMEF will fund continuing research projects, work with Congress and state agencies, track legislative matters, educate hunters and the public, and rally members on predator-related issues so all wildlife populations can be sustained forever. RMEF supports major legislation in Congress that would reinstate the previous U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service wolf delisting rule in the Great Lakes states and Wyoming.”

Molvar disagrees with that statement and says, “The wolf belongs in Western ecosystems. The RMEF is trying to set back conservation 150 years.”


20 thoughts on “Elk Hunting Group Wants to Expand Wolf-Killing Derby into Montana: $1,000 Bounty per Wolf

  1. First of all, supporting fish and game departments through license fees would obviously be an incentive to approve more hunting.

    Hunters want to kill deer and elk because they believe they have the right to all of them. No sharing with predators! Ranchers want more grazing land near wildlife areas. Without the wildlife! On top of that is the long history of wolf hatred. It seems the hunters/ranchers won’t rest until the wolves are gone again. They’ve gotten their own way with extreme and grossly unfair killing of hibernating bears and wolf pups. When you think the human species can’t sink any lower, they find a way to do it.

    Killing animals when they are sleeping or are babies in their den and engaging in mass killing contests destroys the long-standing pretense that there is anything fair or “sporting” about the slaughter.

  2. Boy does that photo piss me off…..yet another good old boy fat fuck and his fat satanic spawn with their wolf kills. Even dead, the wolves are glorious compared to the unfortunately living wads who took their lives. May they both die in a future hunting accident……

      • Oh I fantasize about slaughtering these folks at their coyote culls and wolf killing derbies and the politicians that make these horrors possible, throwing in the folks from Wildlife Services…..one would have to join their cause, win their trust, and then when they are least expecting it…….

  3. This is what happens when an animal is delisted prematurely, especially one that is still being unfairly persecuted and that people still have false, negative ideas about – and a government that is willfully naïve about and complicit in destroying. But yet we keep telling ourselves how well we can ‘manage’ wildlife and what a success story delisting has been! The photo looks like it had a little photoshop help – those wolves look as big as dire wolves! What a bunch o F*****g A******s, all around and in both parties.

      • You got it!

        I can’t give any credit to this group. I’ve been told that because they, supposedly, do a lot for conservation by protecting public lands and acquiring other lands for hunting that would otherwise go to developers, that I should credit them. But since the delisting, there’s been nothing but an escalated killing of wolves, as we knew there would be. Nothing but abuse of responsibility. Predictable, and I can’t stand that people are so susceptible to self-delusion.

    • Not me!

      What is offensive is those self-satisfied idiots who are pathetic compared to the big, beautiful lives they have destroyed.

      A memorial I had made for Romeo, the black wolf from Juneau, Alaska, sits on the desk. I had another placed at Wolf Haven for him when I sponsored a black wolf there. Romeo was killed by a freak like the ones in the picture. There seems to be no stopping them. So I do memorials . . .

      The new hunting of sleeping bears and baby wolves reveals even more of their “sportsmanship.”

  4. The RMEF is a despicable, hunter-directed group, which is now even more empowered by the Washington cronies. Jon Tester should also be hunted or trapped. I share your fantasy, Renee!

  5. Those who are so adamant about hunting (killing) as a right should be sent to war-torn countries where they will have the opportunity to kill,or get killed.

  6. These hunting groups are not true wildlife conservation organizations; they are only interested in sustaining ungulate numbers for their own use. Predators are essential native wildlife too, and deserve to be valued and protected for future generations. And these animals certainly shouldn’t be “managed” by organizations who only see them as competition for their recreational hunting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s